[2025:RJ-JP:47330] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17884/2025 Hetram Son Of Shri Ram Singh, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Near Agrasen School, Jamun Ki Bagichi, Subhash Nagar, Golpura Road, Bharatpur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Executive Director (Admin.), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Kota Depot, District Kota (Raj.) 4. The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Lohagarh-Bharatpur Depot, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayers: “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that the writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be accepted and allowed and; (i) By an appropriate writ, order or directions in the nature thereof, thereby the respondent may [2025:RJ-JP:47330] (2 of 3) [CW-17884/2025] kindly be directed to reimburse the entire dues of the petitioner i.e. gratuity, fifth and sixth pay commission, earned leave, night overtime, G.H. due rest, D.A., weekly rest with 6% p.a. interest amount from the date of accrual in the larger interest of justice. ii) Any other appropriate order or direction which the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner; (iii) Cost of the Writ Petition be awarded in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of respondent(s). 3. Office is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar, Advocate as counsel for respondent(s). 4. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon order dated 26.07.2019 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11474/2019 Bhori Lal Meena Vs. RSRTC submits that the controversy raised herein is already decided by this Hon’ble Court in case of Prahlad Singh Vs. Managing Director, RSRTC, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14748/2014 and further in case of Shankar Lal Choudhary Vs. Shree Rajesh Yadav & Ors. in S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1500/2016 and the respondent(s) are complying the directions as given in said matters. [2025:RJ-JP:47330] (3 of 3) [CW-17884/2025] 5. Learned counsel for respondent submits that if the facts of the case as decided earlier are applicable in the instant case then they will extend the benefit available to the petitioner. 6. Having considered aforesaid, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition in light of ratio laid down in aforementioned cases. 7. The respondents are directed to undertake the necessary exercise of making payment of retiral dues to the petitioner as per his seniority and entitlement within a period of 90 days from date of receipt of copy of this order. The retirement benefits shall be paid as per scheme prevailing in the respondent-Corporation and also in light of judgment referred hereinabove. 8. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /74