Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CR-2956-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2956-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 24, 2025 Shashi Devi ......Petitioner Vs. Lokesh and ors. ......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar Dhanda, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA
J.
C.M. No. 12657-CII-2025 Application is allowed as prayed for. Accordingly, Annexure P-9 is taken on record.
C.R. No. 2956-2025
1. Challenge in the present petition is for issuance of direction to learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Gurugram to decide the application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC filed by the petitioner on 15.03.2022 in Civil Suit CS-922-2022 for restraining the respondents from interfering in the peaceful possession of suit property fully detailed in para No. 2 of the plaint or dispossessing them and further restraining the respondents from alienating or creating third party charge upon suit property in any manner.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that application under
Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 CPC filed by the petitioner on 15.03.2022 in Civil Suit CS-922-2022 is pending since 2022 before the learned Gaurav Arora 2025.07.28 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 CR-2956-2025 (O&M) Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Gurugram and the same is not decided till date. He has placed on record copy of zimini orders with the present petition by way of filing C.M. No. 12657-CII-2025. He prays that directions be issued to learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Gurugram to decide the above referred to application filed by the petitioner expeditiously.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the whole file of this case with his able assistance.
4. A perusal of the zimini orders shows that there is no lapse on the part of learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Gurugram to decide the application filed by the petitioner and as per last zimini order dated 08.04.2025 placed on record by the petitioner by way of filing C.M. No. 12657-CII-2025, arguments on injunction application were not advanced by the learned counsel for the plaintiff/petitioner himself and the case was adjourned to 19.05.2025.
5. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed being devoid of any merit.
6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA)
JUDGE July 24, 2025 Gaurav Arora
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No Gaurav Arora 2025.07.28 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document