Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 4404 (BOM)
PRAKASH GANESH KAITHWAS v. SANTOSH HARISHCHANDRA MURAI AND ANOTHER
SA/198/2025 · 2026-09-08
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4404 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4404 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 sa198.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO.198/2025 Prakash Ganesh Kaithwas ..V/s.. Santosh Harishchandra Murai and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S.C. Bhalerao, Counsel for respondent No.1-Caveator.
CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.
DATED : 8.9.2026. The learned Counsel for the respondent No.1 who is the Caveator has informed the Court that on 09.10.2025 this Court had discharged the learned Counsel for the appellant and had issued notice to the appellant to engage another Counsel. Though the appellant is served, he has not engaged any Counsel and has not taken any steps to proceed further. It appears that the appellant is not interested in proceeding further. Hence the appeal stands dismissed in default.
(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) Tambaskar.
Signed by: MR. N.V. TAMBASKAR Designation: Senior Pvt. Secretary Date: 08/09/2026 17:18:58