[2025:RJ-JP:44010] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16584/2025 Ritika Rajvanshi W/o Abhinav Rajvanshi, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of K-23A, Malviya Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Locl Self Government, Government Secretariat, Jaipur-302005. 2. The Municipal Corporation Jaipur Heritage, Through Its Commissioner, Old Police Headquarters, Behind Hawa Mahal, Badi Chaupad, Jaipur-302002. 3. The Jaipur Development Authority, Through Its Secretary, Jln Marg, Jaipur-302004. 4. Nagar Nigam Jaipur Heritage, Civil Lines Zone, Through Its Deputy Commissioner, Office Of Nagar Nigam, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur-302016 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Kabra, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 03/11/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in front of the petitioner’s residential house, there is a sanctioned 40 feet road. However, the construction in the form of temple has been undertaken in front of her house upon the land forming part of public road. Counsel for the petitioner has placed on record photographs showing that there is a residential apartment situated in front of the petitioner’s house and construction of a temple, which would have been raised within the boundary of the land of the residential apartment, has been started outside the boundary wall of the residential apartment, upon the land forming part of public way. [2025:RJ-JP:44010] (2 of 2) [CW-16584/2025] Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted representations to the Nagar Nigam, Jaipur Heritage, however, no action thereupon has been taken by the respondent-authority. Counsel for the petitioner submits that she would be satisfied if the appropriate directions are issued to the respondent – Municipal Corporation, Jaipur Heritage to decide the representation so submitted and to take appropriate action with regard to the alleged illegal construction over the land of public way, in accordance with law. The prayer so made by the petitioner deserve acceptance. The writ petition is dispossed off with a direction to the petitioner to submit a detailed representation while enclosing all the necessary documents to respondent No.2 - Municipal Corporation, Jaipur Heritage within a period of 7 days from today. The respondent No.2 - Municipal Corporation, Jaipur Heritage shall take immediate and appropriate action upon the representation of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of said representation, after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. It is made clear that directions in this order shall not be construed to decide the petitioner’s representation in a particular way and the action is required to be undertaken, in accordance with law. With these, observations, the instant writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J AVINASH GULERIA /4