CWP-10032-2025 (O&M) 140 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Navjot Kaur State of Punjab CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Mr. Neeraj Madaan, SUDHIR SINGH Present nature of Mandamus belt falling in Sector 65, Ph and ending at H.No.65 to be got vacated from illegal occupations respondents, but due to lack of development, the same has again been encroached upon by the adjoining residents of the area, despite the fact that the said illegal possessions were got vacated earlier by the Municipal Corporation, but the Park was not the other green belts and the said belt is now again been general public and no effective despite legal notice dated 27.11.2024 (Annexure P the respondent authorities. 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH versus Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Mr. N.P.S. Mann, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Neeraj Madaan, Senior DAG Punjab. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present petition herein, inter alia, andamus directing the respondents to belt falling in Sector 65, Ph-XI, SAS Nagar, Mohali starting from House No.158 and ending at H.No.65 as per the site plan (Annexure P to be got vacated from illegal occupations of the adjoining households by the respondents, but due to lack of development, the same has again been encroached upon by the adjoining residents of the area, despite the fact that the ssessions were got vacated earlier by the Municipal Corporation, but the Park was not developed in the said green belt as has been developed in the other green belts and the said belt is now again been general public and no effective steps have been taken to develop the said park despite legal notice dated 27.11.2024 (Annexure P the respondent authorities. 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10032-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: April 07, 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH SUKHVINDER KAUR the petitioner. Senior DAG Punjab. , is for issuance of a Writ in the respondents to develop the park in the green XI, SAS Nagar, Mohali starting from House No.158 as per the site plan (Annexure P-1), which has been stated of the adjoining households by the respondents, but due to lack of development, the same has again been encroached upon by the adjoining residents of the area, despite the fact that the ssessions were got vacated earlier by the Municipal Corporation, developed in the said green belt as has been developed in the other green belts and the said belt is now again been encroached upon by the steps have been taken to develop the said park despite legal notice dated 27.11.2024 (Annexure P-9) issued by the petitioner to 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner s in the develop the park in the green XI, SAS Nagar, Mohali starting from House No.158 been stated of the adjoining households by the respondents, but due to lack of development, the same has again been encroached upon by the adjoining residents of the area, despite the fact that the ssessions were got vacated earlier by the Municipal Corporation, developed in the said green belt as has been developed in encroached upon by the steps have been taken to develop the said park to MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.11 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-10032-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would be satisfied, in case, his pending legal notice dated 27.11.2024 (Annexure P-9) is decided by respondent No.3, which has not been adverted to by the respondents till date. 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, learned State counsel appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He submits that grievance of the petitioner will be looked into by respondent No.3 and it shall take decision either way, on pending legal notice dated 27.11.2024 (Annexure P- 9) of the petitioner. 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider pending legal notice dated 27.11.2024 (Annexure P-9) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 08 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE April 07, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.04.11 16:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment