Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2025 DAILYLAW 4402 (RAJ)
SH RAMGANJ BALAJI PARMARTH SANGH MANDIR SHRI RAMGANJ BALAJI v. RAM NARAYAN S/O SHRI ONKAR NAGAR
CMA/624/2013 · 2025-01-02
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4402 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4402 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:171] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 624/2013
1. Sh Ramganj Balaji Parmarth Sangh Mandir Shri Ramganj Balaji, Tehsil And District Bundi (Rajasthan).
2. Badri Lal S/o Shri Lal, Mahajan Maheshwari, Resident Of Bundi, District Bundi (Rajasthan). ----Appellants Versus
1. Ram Narayan S/o Shri Onkar Nagar, Resident Of Daulara, Dist. Bundi(Raj.).
2. Khana S/o Nand Lal Nagar, Resident Of Raita, Dist. Bundi (Raj.).
3. Nar Singh Lal S/o Mangilal, Mahajan Maheshwari, Resident Of Ramganj, Dist. Bundi(Raj.).
4. Jagdish Kumar S/o Jamnalal Mahajan Maheshwari, Resident Of Amar Katla, Dist. Bundi (Raj.).
5. Kishan Singh S/o Sanwat Singh Rajput, Resident Of Umrach, Dist,. Bundi(Raj.).
6. Dev Lal S/o Jagganath Nagar, Resident Of Umrach, Dist. Bundi (Raj.).
7. Mahaveer Prasad S/o Khubram, Resident Of Baharli Bundi, Dist. Bundi (Raj.).
8. Badri Lal S/o Kanwar Lal Nagar, Resident Of Daulara, Dist. Bundi (Raj.).
9. Prabhulal S/o Nandlal Mali, Resident Of Ramganj, Dist. Bundi (Raj.) (Deleted Due To Death).
10. Sheoji Ram S/o Mangilal Gurjar, Resident Of Ramganj, Dist, Bundi (Raj.).
11. Deva S/o Goverdhan Gurjar, Resident Of Of Ramganj, Dist. Bundi (Raj.) (Deleted Due To Death).
12. Ram Prasad S/o Sarvan, Resident Of Jawahar Colony, Bundi (Raj.) At Present, Ramganj Balaji, Bundi, Dist. Bundi (Raj.).
13. Assistant Commissioner, Devasthan Department, Kota (Raj.). ----Respondents
[2025:RJ-JP:171] (2 of 2) [CMA-624/2013] For Appellant(s) : Mr. Jai Sharma for Mr. Ajeet Bhandari, Senior Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 02/01/2025
1.
Learned counsel for appellant pleads no instruction.
2. Despite taking up the matter after notice on Board, no one appeared for appellant.
3. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. Misc. application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /95