19-WP388-2025.DOC Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.388 OF 2025 Vijay Tukara Torane ...Petitioner Versus Madhukar Hujra Torne and ors. …Respondents Ms. Priyanka Naik, for the Petitioner. CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 16th JANUARY, 2025 PC:- 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. The challenge in this petition is to an order passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jath, District Sangli, in a Final Decree proceeding No.2 of 2019, whereby the objections raised by the petitioner – Judgment Debtor to the execution of the decree have been rejected. The principal objection seems to be to the report of the commission appointed by the Court to partition the property. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to an order dated 21st October, 2024, passed by the Executing Court, the decree has already been executed and the petitioner dispossessed. 1/2 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2025.01.18 14:37:46 +0530 19-WP388-2025.DOC 4. In view of the aforesaid development, at this stage, there is no propriety in entertaining this petition. 5. Keeping open the remedies, which the petitioner may have in law, the petition stands dismissed. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2