APHC010350532002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 20796 OF 2002 Between: A. Krishna Rao, Dhone, S/o. Late Narayana Rao, EX-MMGS-II OFFICERIN SBI, R/o Dhone, Kurnool District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The Chief General Manager Appellate Authority State Bank, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Hyderabad. 2. The General Manager Appointing, Authority State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Hyderabad. 3. The Dy General Manager Disciplinary Authority, State Bank of India, Local Head Office, Hyderabad. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the order dated 19-6-2002 of the 1st Respondent confirming the penalty of removal order dated 19.3.2002 of the 2nd respondent as arbitrary discriminatory and illegal and consequentlyset aside the same and direct the Respondents to instate one in to service forthwith in the light of judgement dated 3-10-2002 in CC No. 215 of 1999 on i I the file of the Judicial Magistrate of 1st Class Dhone, Kurnool District with all other Consequential benefits, monetary and otherwise. lA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 26033 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the 1st Respondent to reconsider the penalty of the removal of the petitioner from service in the light of the judgment dated 3-10-2002 in CC NO. 215 of 1999 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhone, Kurnool District, pending disposed of the Writ Petition. lA NO: 1 OF 2005fWPMP 32870 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to hear and dispose of the above WP NO. 20796/2002 as expeditiously possible. lA NO: 1 OF 2009fWPMP 14700 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to take up the writ petition for final disposal on out-of-turn basis. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P KISHORE RAO Counsel for the Respondents: UTTARA LEGAL Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: M/S V UMA DEVI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K SRINIVASA MURTHY The Court made the following order: APHC010350532002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH At AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 20796/2002 Between: 1.A.KRISHNA RAO.DHONE.KURNOOL DISTRICT., S/0. LATE NARAYANA RAO, EX-MMGS-II OFFICER IN SBI, R/0 DHONE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER APPELLATE AUTHORITY STATE BANK, STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, HYDERABAD. 2.THE GENERAL MANAGER APPOINTING,AUTHORITYSTATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, HYDERABAD. 3.THE DY GENERAL MANAGER DISCIPLINARYAUTHORITY, STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the order dated 19-6-2002 of the 1st Respondent confirming the penalty of removal order dated 19.3.2002 of the 2nd respondent as arbitrary discriminatory and illegal and consequently set aside the same and direct the Respondents to instate one in to service forthwith in the light of judgement dated 3-10-2002 in CC No. 215 of 1999 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of 1st Class Dhone, Kurnool District with all other Consequential benefits, monetary and otherwise and pass I r>F 9nn2fWPMP ^fiQ33 OF 2002 lA NO: 1 ^ Q^otinn 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated pass lA NO: 1 OF ?nQ5(WPMP ^2870 OF 2005 J C o+i.^n CPC oravinq that in the circumstances stated hear and dispose and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 7nQ9(WPNIP 14700 OF 2009 under Section 151 CPC praying that in the f ^ the High Court may be pleased to out-of-turn basis and pass Petition in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, take up the writ petition for final disposal on Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.P KISHORE RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.UTTARA LEGAL 2.V DMA DEVI 3.K SRINIVASA MURTHY The Court made the following: ORDER: there was no 07.07.2025 and 25.07.2025 and the matter was posted under the caption On 24.09.2021 representation for the petitioner for dismissal. 2. Despite the matter being also, there is no listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Petition for dismissed IS Writ the 3. Accordingly non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO deputy registrar SECTION OFFICER //true copy// To, Authority State Bank, State 1 The Chief General Manager Appellate Local Head Office, Hyderabad. mPUCl 6 One^C to M/S V Uma Devi, Advocate 7. One CC to Sri. K Srinivasa Murthy, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CD Copies. AL I HIGH COURT DATED;01/08/2025 I ORDER WP NO. 20796 OF 2002 ' 2 4 GCT 20 /'I ★ ..uw ViU udCUvii DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS