RAVISHEK YADAV ALIAS ABHAY YADAV v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
BA1/2200/2025 · 2026-01-02
Alok Mahra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 440 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 440 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
BA1 No. 2200 of 2025 Hon ’ble Alok Mah r a, J.
Mr. Vikas Anand, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. This first bail application has been moved by the applicant seeking regular bail in F.I.R. No. 476 of 2025, under Sections 109, 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of B.N.S., registered at Police Station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He submits that the allegations levelled against the applicant are wholly baseless and motivated. It is submitted that the applicant is a person of clean antecedents, having no criminal history whatsoever, and that he has been languishing in judicial custody since
23.09.2025. Learned counsel further submits that there is no independent witness to lend corroboration to the prosecution version of the alleged occurrence, and the entire case rests upon interested testimony. It is further argued that in the statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, no specific role or overt act has been attributed to the applicant. The applicant is a student pursuing his academic career, and his continued incarceration will not only cause irreparable harm to his education but will also have a
devastating effect on his future prospects. It is thus prayed that, considering the nature of allegations, the absence of any prior criminal antecedents, and the period of custody undergone, the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
5. Learned State Counsel vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail at this stage.
7. The bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant, namely, Ravishek Yadav @ Abhay Yadav be released on bail, on executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of like amount, to the satisfaction of Court concerned.
( Alok Mah r a J.)
02.01.2026 Ujjwal