On 26.12.2025, this Court had passed the following order: “Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case arising out of FIR No. 475 dated 09.12.2025 under Sections 21(b)/27A/61/85 Narcotic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station City, District Fatehabad. This is the first petition for anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the recovery of 13 grams 18 miligrams of Heroin had been effected from possession of Kumar son of Bablu Ram and petitioner had nominated as accused in the case only on the basis of disclosure statement mad not admissible in evidence. He petitioner had been falsely implicated in the FIR and there was no prime material to establish his involvement in the offence. Petitioner, who had no criminal history was ready and willing to join Notice of motion. Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG Haryana, who is present in the Court accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State, seeks some time to , this Court had passed the following order:- Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case arising No. 475 dated 09.12.2025 under Sections 21(b)/27A/61/85 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station City, Fatehabad, District Fatehabad. This is the first petition for Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 13 grams 18 miligrams of Heroin had been effected from possession of co-accused namely Sandeep Kumar son of Bablu Ram and petitioner had been nominated as accused in the case only on the basis of statement made by co-accused, which was not admissible in evidence. He further submits that petitioner had been falsely implicated in the FIR and there was no prime material to establish his involvement Petitioner, who had no criminal history and willing to join investigation. Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG Haryana, who is Court accepts notice on behalf of State, seeks some time to file status report PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.22 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail arguing that petitioner was main supplier of contraband. In view of the fact that contraband allegedly recovered from possession of co-accused falls within the ambit of intermediate quantity and the only material against the petitioner is the disclosure statement of co- accused, in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on interim anticipatory bail subject to his furnishing personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting/Investigating Officer. Petitioner shall join investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Status report in the matter be filed on 22.01.2026.” 2. Learned counsel submits that in pursuance of the afore- mentioned order, the petitioner has not only joined investigation but also fully cooperated with the investigating agency. He further submits that in case the investigating agency requires the petitioner to appear, he shall make himself available without demur. 3. Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Malkit Singh affirms the factum of joining the investigation by the petitioner and cooperating with the investigating agency. He also submits that at this stage, the petitioner is not required for further custodial interrogation. 4. In view of the above and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner is allowed and the order dated 26.12.2025 granting interim bail to him, is hereby made absolute, subject to compliance of conditions as specified under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 5. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner fails to join and cooperate with the investigating agency as and when required, the State would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of the present anticipatory bail granted to him. PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.01.22 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.