Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43997 (KAR)

NARENDRA BALU YADAV v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/106677/2024 · 2025-03-04

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4169 WP No. 106677 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 106677 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: NARENDRA BALU YADAV, AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: H.NO.52, BHAVAKESHWARI GALLI, SULAGE YELLUR, BELAGAVI-05. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANWARALI D. NADAF, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-01. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BELAGAVI RURAL POLICE STATION, BELAGAVI-01. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (LAW AND ORDER), BEHIND LINGRAJ COLLEGE, BELAGAVI-01. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN.K.UPPAR, AGA FOR R1-R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4169 WP No. 106677 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Praveen K.Uppar., AGA for the respondents has appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 & 3 to consider the representation vide Annexures ‘A’ & ‘B’ and register the FIR against the accused persons. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care. 4. AGA submits that a memo has been filed stating that the representation submitted by the petitioner has been considered and the same has been communicated to the petitioner by issuing an endorsement dated 26.11.2024. AGA therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made by AGA and the memo is placed on record. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4169 WP No. 106677 of 2024 5. Because of consideration of the representation submitted by the petitioner, nothing survives for the consideration as of today. Moreover, the relief sought by the petitioner has been considered. Hence, the Writ Petition is rejected. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP,RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 25