MANOJ KUMAR S/O LAL MOHAMMED v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14262/2025 · 2025-11-03
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43995 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43995 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:44083] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14262/2025 Manoj Kumar S/o Lal Mohammed, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Nayama, Police Station Salasar, District Churu. (Presently Confined In Jail At Sub Laxmangarh, District Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Utkarsh Goyal, Ms. Chanchal and Mr. Apurv Goyal for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 03/11/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.16/2025 registered at Police Station Nechhawa, District Sikar for offence under Sections 16/54 of NDPS Act.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that recovery has been affected at the instance of co-accused Pyare Lal and said co-accused Pyare Lal has been enlarged on bail by co- ordinate Bench of this Court on 22.04.2025. He argued that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He again submits that the petitioner is behind the bars
[2025:RJ-JP:44083] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14262/2025] since 12.10.2025. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Manoj Kumar S/o Lal Mohammed, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/3