Bommadevara Babu Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/17691/2019 · 2025-11-11
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43992 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43992 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010371392019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 17691/2019
Between:
1. BOMMADEVARA BABU RAO, S/O. LATE. NARASIMHA RAO AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO. 9- 84/G, KANKIPADU, KRISHNA DISTRICT – 521151.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.
2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, , KANKIPADU PS, KANKIPADU, KRISHNA DIST.,
3. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
5. THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, WEST ZONE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
6. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANKIPADU CIRCLE, KANKIPADU, KRISHNA DIST.,
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more
2 particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents more particularly the 2nd respondent in not registering the FIR on the complaint made by the petitioner on 13.10.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to register the FIR on the report made by the petitioner on 13.10.2018 and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to register the FIR on the report made by the petitioner on 13.10.2018, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B S N NAIDU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.17691 OF 2019
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondents more particularly the 2nd respondent in not registering the FIR on the complaint made by the petitioner on 13.10.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to register the FIR on the report made by the petitioner on 13.10.2018 and pass…”
2. Sri Sk.S.Hussain, learned counsel representing Sri B.S.N.Naidu,
learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
3. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance.
4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 12.11.2025 Pmk
4 23 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No:17691 OF 2019
Date:12.11.2025
Pmk