Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:KER:28529 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RP NO. 354 OF 2025 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.02.2025 IN RFA NO.220 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONERS/APPELLANT IN RFA: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN - 695001 2 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER P W D BUILDINGS AND LOCAL WORKS, SOUTH CIRCLE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695033 BY ADV GOVERNMENT PLEADER K.V.MANOJ KUMAR-SR.GP RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN RFA:
M/S. SURYA CONSTRUCTIONS PALACE ARCADE,STATUE JUNCTION,THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP,REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER JOSE VALOTHIL,VALOTHIL HOUSE, LITTLE PALACE LANE, THIRUVAMKULAM P.O,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682305., PIN – 682301 THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2025:KER:28529
Sathish Ninan & Shoba Annamma Eapen, JJ. ========================================= RP No.354 of 2025 ========================================= Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2025 ORDER Sathish Ninan, J. The contentions urged in the review were urged before this Court while arguing on the maintainability of the appeal. The Apex Court has repeatedly cautioned that the review is not to be an appeal in disguise to enable a rehearing. There is no error apparent on the face of the record calling for entertainment of the review. The
Review
petition
stands dismissed.
Sd/- Sathish Ninan, Judge
Sd/- Shoba Annamma Eapen, Judge SVP