CRWP-3574 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (104) Amarinder Singh Brar State of Punjab and others CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN 1. Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing official and restrain the private respondents from in belonging to undivided estate of Late H.H. Colonel Harinder Faridkot. 2. Kumar, who is also present in Court has submitted that the two fold prayer made in the present petition needs to be bifurcated. He submits that as regards the protection of property 3574-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amarinder Singh Brar Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Bharat Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Puru Jarewal, AAG, Punjab. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus official respondent to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and restrain the private respondents from in belonging to undivided estate of Late H.H. Colonel Harinder Learned State counsel on instructions from S Kumar, who is also present in Court has submitted that the two fold prayer e present petition needs to be bifurcated. He submits that as regards the protection of property is concerned IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3574-2025 Date of Decision:- 15.04.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Advocate Mr. Puru Jarewal, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus respondent to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and restrain the private respondents from interference into the land belonging to undivided estate of Late H.H. Colonel Harinder Singh Brar of Learned State counsel on instructions from SP(D) Sandeep Kumar, who is also present in Court has submitted that the two fold prayer e present petition needs to be bifurcated. He submits that as concerned, the same is a civil dispute 2025 15.04.2025 ……Petitioner s The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus respondent to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner terference into the land ingh Brar of Sandeep Kumar, who is also present in Court has submitted that the two fold prayer e present petition needs to be bifurcated. He submits that as civil dispute PARUL 2025.04.15 14:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRWP-3574 between the parties and it would be beyond the authorities to life and liberty is appropriate incident or exigency 3. have any such statement made by SP correct, he prays for threat arises 4. learned State counsel petitioner is of any threat to life and liberty arises. 15.04.2025 Parul 3574-2025 2 between the parties and it would be beyond the authorities to interfere in the same. However, as regards the protection of life and liberty is concerned he has instructions to submit police force has been deployed to avoid or exigency. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit such instructions from the petitioner, however, taking the statement made by SP(D) Sandeep Kumar and the correct, he prays for liberty to approach the authorities threat arises. In light of the statement made by learned State counsel, the present petition is permitted to approach the competent authorities only, in case, of any threat to life and liberty arises. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable:- between the parties and it would be beyond the jurisdiction of the police However, as regards the protection of concerned he has instructions to submit that sufficient and deployed to avoid any inadvertent Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not instructions from the petitioner, however, taking the Sandeep Kumar and the State counsel to be liberty to approach the authorities, in case, any fresh In light of the statement made by SP(D) Sandeep Kumar and , the present petition is disposed of. However, the permitted to approach the competent authorities only, in case, (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Yes/No jurisdiction of the police However, as regards the protection of sufficient and any inadvertent s that he does not instructions from the petitioner, however, taking the State counsel to be any fresh Sandeep Kumar and he permitted to approach the competent authorities only, in case, PARUL 2025.04.15 14:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document