Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43984 (AP)

Sipani Rajashekar, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/2579/2025 · 2025-03-19

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010042082026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 2579/2026 Between: 1. Y RAMASUBRAHMANYAM, S/O. TIRUPATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. 41-7-26, VIKRAM DURGAYYA STREET, HARINADHAPURAM, KRISHNALANKA, VIJAYAWADA URBAN, NTR KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 520013. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522237 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522237 3. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE COUNCIL OF HIGHER EDUCATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, NEELADRI TOWERS, 6TH BATTALION ROAD, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522503. 4. THE AP STATE KAPU WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, A GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH UNDERTAKING, 12-467, 3RD FLOOR, POTHURI MERCANTILE, NH-16 SERVICE ROAD, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522501 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature 2 of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly 4th respondent in not releasing the Financial Assistance for studying abroad under Videshi Vidya Deevana Scheme for the year 2023-2024 to my son having been approved of her name for the said benefit by the State Level Screening Committee as highly illegal, opposed to the Policy Decision of the Government, Arbitrary exercise of power and also opposed to legitimate expectation and consequently direct the respondents to release the financial assistance under the said scheme forthwith to mitigate the hardship of the selected student and pass such other order. IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the financial assistance to my son under Videshi Vidya Deevana Scheme forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order. IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to implead the proposed petitioner in cause title of the Writ Petition No.2579 of 2026 as 2nd Petitioner in the interest/ of justice and pass such other order. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N SRIHARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 2. K RADHIKA 3. Chejarla Venkateswara rao SC For A.P.Kapu welfare and developement Corp.LTD 4. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.2579 of 2026 ORDER: 1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondents in not releasing financial assistance sanctioned to the Petitioner No.2 for studying abroad under “Videshi Vidya Deevana Scheme” for the academic year 2023-24, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Petitioner No.2 had applied for financial assistance under “Videshi Vidya Deevana Scheme” for studying abroad for the academic year 2023-24 and the same was allotted with Application No.2023000052. After due verification, Respondent No.4 sanctioned financial assistance in favour of Petitioner No.2 for pursuing Master’s in Construction Management Course at the NYU Tandon School of Engineering etc., Though, Petitioner No.2 had completed his Master’s Course, the financial assistance as promised to Petitioner No.2 was not disbursed to him. Hence, the present Writ Petition is filed. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.4- Corporation submits that the application of Petitioner No.2 would be considered and the amounts would be sanctioned, if Petitioner No.2 is within the conditions specified, for release of the amounts. 4 4. Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of, with the following directions:- (i) The Respondents are directed to examine the claim of Petitioner No.2 within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order; (ii) In the event, the claim of Petitioner No.2 is held to be in order, the Respondents are directed to release the amounts to Petitioner No.2 within a further period of eight (08) weeks; (iii) There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 09.03.2026 IS 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.2579 of 2026 Date: 09.03.2026 IS