Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3831 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed against the order allowing the application filed by the third party under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC.
3. Since the order passed in proceedings under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC is a decree under Order 21 Rule 103 CPC, therefore, the same is appealable.
4. In view of the same, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter.
5. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy, as available to him, under the law. September 18, 2025 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Animesh Pandey, Awadhesh Kumar Malviya Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shashi Shukla, Surya Narayan (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Tap Narayan Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Arvind Mishra .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad