Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43980 (RAJ)

VISHNU SINGH SHEKHAWAT @ BALLU RAJPURA @ LOKENDRA SINGH S/O NANDU SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10087/2025 · 2025-11-04

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44220] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10087/2025 Vishnu Singh Shekhawat @ Ballu Rajpura @ Lokendra Singh S/o Nandu Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Rajpura Tehsil Dantaramgarh, Police Station Losal, District Sikar, Presently House Number 20, Opposite Rc Plaza, Gokulpura, Police Station Kardhani Jaipur. (Presently Accused Petitioner Is In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Vijaywargia For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Saurabh Pratap for Mr. Aniket Sharma HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 04/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 297/2025 registered at Police Station Kardhani District Jaipur for the offence(s) under Sections 307, 324(4), 324(5), 351(2), 351(3) BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has fairly contended that there are approx. 19 criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. It is submitted that present offence is petty in nature and merely on account of criminal antecedents, applicant is not being granted bail by the learned Trial Court. Learned counsel has submitted that present dispute is [2025:RJ-JP:44220] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10087/2025] of payment of Rs. 3,880/- for filling the petrol in the vehicle. Furthermore, it is submitted that applicant is ready to abide by the conditions imposed by this Court. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that present offense is petty in nature; that the trial will take time and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Vishnu Singh Shekhawat @ Ballu Rajpura @ Lokendra Singh S/o Nandu Singh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 6. Considering the criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant, this court deems it fit to direct the accused- applicant to reside for a period of two months at a distance of 250 Kms, from the place of his present residence and periodically mark attendance at the concerned Police Station once on every 5th of the month. Furthermore, after completion of the aforesaid condition, it is directed that the accused-applicant shall contribute to the Swach [2025:RJ-JP:44220] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10087/2025] Bharat Abhiyan – initiative of the government, for a period of two months, on two hours per day basis, as an honorary work, under the supervision and directions of the SHO qua the FIR (Supra) in consonance with the directions of the Municipal Corporation/Local Administrative authorities concerned. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /9