[2025:RJ-JP:3349] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1058/2025 Purshottam Son Of Samay Singh, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Jat Ki Saray, Police Station Hindaun City, District Karauli (Rajasthan) ( At Present In Sub Jail Hindaun City) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 23/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS., on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.19/2025 registered at Police Station Hindaun, District Karauli (Raj.) for the offence punishable under Section 8/20 of NDPS Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that it has been alleged by the prosecution that petitioner was found in possession of 1 Kg 24 gram of Ganja along with polythene bag. It is submitted that the alleged recovered contraband is marginally above from the small quantity. Petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest. Counsel argues that trial of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:3349] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1058/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. She submits that one other case has been registered against the petitioner under the NDPS Act. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, especially the fact that alleged recovered contraband (ganja) is marginally above from the small quantity; trial of the case will take time in its conclusion; looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. The observations made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Purshottam Son Of Samay Singh, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. [2025:RJ-JP:3349] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1058/2025] 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /242