MOHAMMAD SALEEM NAGORI SON OF ABDUL GANI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/8984/2022 · 2025-10-29
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43976 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43976 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8984/2022
1. Mohammad Saleem Nagori Son Of Abdul Gani, Resident Of Ward No. 44, Mohalla Islampur, Near Akbari Masjid, Sikar, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj). 2. Irfan Son Of Mohammad Saleem Nagori, Resident Of Ward No. 44, Mohalla Islampur, Near Akbari Masjid, Sikar, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Jameel Ahamad Son Of Shri Abdul Gani Nagori, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 4, Deen Mohammad Road, Kadar Ki Chakki, Sikar, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashir Gauri for Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain Mr. Sanjay Khedar JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 29/10/2025
1. Present criminal misc. petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.611/2022 registered with Police Station Kotwali Sikar, District Sikar for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that after registration of aforesaid FIR, the parties have settled their dispute, which is of personal nature and it has been borne out
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-8984/2022] from the compromise that the complainant is not inclined to proceed further in this matter against the accused persons. In support of their contentions, they have placed reliance upon the judgments passed by the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 & State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan & Ors., reported in (2019) 5 SCC 688 and submit that the proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR be quashed. 3. The complainant has put appearance in person, who has been duly identified by his counsel and has admitted the factum of compromise between the parties and the same has been verified by his counsel. 4. Thus, in the view of the aforesaid compromise arrived at between the parties and applying the principles of law as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court deems it just and appropriate to invoke inherent powers of this Court under Section 528 BNSS. 5. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition is allowed.
Proceedings arising out of impugned FIR No.611/2022, registered with Police Station Kotwali Sikar, District Sikar for the offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, against the petitioner stands quashed and set-aside. 6. Stay application and all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/115