111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3458-2025 Date of Decision:07.04.2025 MEENU RANI AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. N.S. Gill, Advocate for Mr. Armaan Gagneja, Advocate for the petitioners. SANDEEP MOUDGIL , J. (Oral) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 226/227 of the Contitution of India for directing official respondent nos. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos. 4 to 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 01.04.2025 (Annexure P-3), within a time bound manner. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Jastej Singh, DAG Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State and submits that representation is not received in the office of respondent No.2. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Muktsar Sahib, Punjab, to treat the petition as representation and decide the same in the light of notification No. HOMEHM-40 40SECM/14/2025-2H4/63 dated 23.01.2025 issued by the KUMUD VERMA 2025.04.09 10:39 I am approving this document Chandigarh CRWP-3458-2025 -2- Department of Home Affairs, Punjab, Government of Punjab (Home-4 Branch), within a period of three days from today itself. Learned State counsel undertakes to convey the order of this Court to the office of Senior Superintendent of Police, Muktsar Sahib, Punjab, for necessary compliance. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 07.04.2025 kv Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KUMUD VERMA 2025.04.09 10:39 I am approving this document Chandigarh