CRWP-3453 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND 115 Tarsem Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE Present:- MANISHA BATRA, J. 1. Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India No. 2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members from the hands of respondent No. 6 by considering his grievances as raised in the representation dated 10.02.2025 (Annexure P submitted by him to respondent No. 4 2. Punjab has submitted that the dispute is purely of civil nature and the aforesaid representation, moved by the petitioner, has been filed after conducting a thorough inquiry into the matter. Hence petition is prayed for. 3. submitted that a direction may be issued to the official respondents to protect 3453-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Tarsem Singh Versus Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Nirbhay Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members from the hands of respondent No. 6 by considering his grievances as raised in the representation dated 10.02.2025 (Annexure P submitted by him to respondent No. 4-Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga. At the very outset, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab has submitted that the dispute is purely of civil nature and the aforesaid representation, moved by the petitioner, has been filed after conducting a thorough inquiry into the matter. Hence petition is prayed for. Faced with the same, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a direction may be issued to the official respondents to protect - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-3453-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 08.04.2025 ...Petitioner Versus ...Respondents MANISHA BATRA Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to respondent and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members from the hands of respondent No. 6 by considering his grievances as raised in the representation dated 10.02.2025 (Annexure P-5), which has been Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga. At the very outset, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab has submitted that the dispute is purely of civil nature and the aforesaid representation, moved by the petitioner, has been filed after conducting a thorough inquiry into the matter. Hence, the dismissal of the Faced with the same, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a direction may be issued to the official respondents to protect -1- 2025 (O&M) : 08.04.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents under seeking direction to respondents and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members from the hands of respondent No. 6 by considering his grievances as as been Senior Superintendent of Police, Moga. At the very outset, learned Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab has submitted that the dispute is purely of civil nature and the aforesaid representation, moved by the petitioner, has been filed after , the dismissal of the Faced with the same, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a direction may be issued to the official respondents to protect MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.04.09 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-3453 the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family member at respondent No. 6. 4. made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of. The official respondents are directed to assess the threat perception to the life and liberty of the petitioner as well as his family members and provide them adequate protection, if so required. 08.04.2025 Waseem Ansari Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 3453-2025 (O&M) the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family member at respondent No. 6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts as well as the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of. The official respondents are directed to assess the threat perception to the life and liberty of the petitioner as well as his family members and provide them adequate , if so required. 08.04.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable - the life and liberty of the petitioner and his family member at the hands of Keeping in view the aforesaid facts as well as the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of. The official respondents are directed to assess the threat perception to the life and liberty of the petitioner as well as his family members and provide them adequate (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No -2- the hands of Keeping in view the aforesaid facts as well as the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of. The official respondents are directed to assess the threat perception to the life and liberty of the petitioner as well as his family members and provide them adequate MOHAMMAD WASEEM ANSARI 2025.04.09 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document