[2025:RJ-JP:48357] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12612/2023 1. Arvind Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Chaturbhuj Sharma, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Behind Beer Bar, Main Road, Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 2. Amritlal Meena Son Of Hajarilal Meena, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Village Raneta, Tehsil Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 3. Vedprakash Sharma Son Of Ghanshyam Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Gajjupura, Tehsil Sapotara, Dsitrict Karauli (Raj.) 4. Ramesh Chand Bairwa Son Of Bhorya Bairwa, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Village Dafalpur, Post Kudgaon, Tehsil And District Karauli (Raj.) 5. Dilip Vashishtha Son Of Brijmohan Lal Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Village Dhoolwas, Tehsil Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) 6. Dharmendra Kumar Sharma Son Of Prabhulal Sharma, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Bohre Ka Bag, Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Secretary, Department Of Personal, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The Chief Executive Officer Cum Additional District Program Coordinator, Zila Parishad Karauli (Raj.) 4. The Development Officer Cum Program Officer, Panchayat Samiti Sapotara, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Gauttam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC [2025:RJ-JP:48357] (2 of 3) [CW-12612/2023] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer:- “a) The respondents may kindly be directed to issue appointment orders in favour of petitioners on the post of data entry operator cum computer operator as per rule 12 of contractual hiring rule, 2022; b) The respondents may kindly be directed to allow to the petitioners to perform their duty on the post of data entry operator cum computer operator by issuing appointment orders under contractual hiring rule 2022 with all consequential benefits: c) May kindly be issue direction respondents for to the not replace to the petitioners from the another set-up of contractual employee; d) Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble court deems just and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon order dated 26.08.2025 in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11737/2024 (Rodu Lal and Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and other connected matters submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. [2025:RJ-JP:48357] (3 of 3) [CW-12612/2023] 3. Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice. Office is directed to reflect his name as counsel for the respondents. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Rodu Lal and Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) passed by the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur, if applicable on facts of the case. 5. While disposing of the writ petition, we have not considered the facts of the case but the respondents are at liberty to verify the veracity of facts as claimed by the petitioners. 6. Misc. application, if any, also stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/363