Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43962 (BOM)

PANKAJ JAYRAM BORATE AND ORS v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

IA/203/2025 · 2025-07-21

Shri A S Gadkari, Shri Rajesh S Patil

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

DDR 25. IA 203-25.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 203 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3516 OF 2024 Pankaj Jayram Borate & Ors. ..Applicants Vs. The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. ..Respondents _______________________________ Mr. Rajabhau S. Chaudhari i/b. Mr. Swapnil S. Anandkar for Applicants. Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, APP for Respondent No.1-State. _______________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 21st July, 2025. P.C.:- 1) This is an Application for restoration of Criminal Writ Petition No. 3516 of 2024, which was dismissed for non-compliance of the directions issued in Paragraph No.3 of Order dated 19th August 2024. 1.1) There is a delay of sixty days in preparing present Application. 2) Perusal of the Application indicates that, no plausible explanation is offered by the Applicants for condonation of said delay. However, at the request of learned Advocate for the Applicants and on a statement made by him that, the Applicants will pay a cost of Rs.3,000/- to the Kirtikar Law Library, High Court, Mumbai, within a period of two weeks 1/2 2025:BHC-AS:31258-DB DDR 25. IA 203-25.doc from the date of uploading of the present Order on the official website of High Court of Bombay. 3) On the solemn statement made by the Advocate for Applicants before this Court, the delay is condoned and Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) & (b). 4) Necessary amendments be carried out within a period of two weeks from the date of payment of cost to the said Library. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2 Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 25/07/2025 20:47:08