1 2025:CGHC:27293 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5928 of 2024 1 - Narayan Sahu S/o Shri Kuber Prasad Aged About 21 Years R/o Main Road Ward No. 1 Chhindad Baikunthpur, District Koriya Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Secondry Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Chhattisgarh Board Of Secondary Education Raipur Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Ravikar Patel, Advocate For Respondent/State For Respondent No.2 : : Ms. Upasna Mehta, Dy. GA Shri Animesh Tiwari, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 23/06/2025 The petitioner has filed this present petition seeking following relief(s) : 10.1. That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.06.25 11:48:26 +0530 2 to call for the entire records pertaining to case of the petitioner perusal of the Hon’ble Court. 10.2. That the Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to direct respondents to consider his representation and comply the order of this Court. 10.3. That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside/quash the order dated 18.102.2024 (Annexure P/6) 10.4. Any other relief which the Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that had passed out class 10th examination from the Board/respondent No.2 however due to typographical error, the date of birth of the petitioner has been wrongly mentioned as 22.11.2013 in place of 22.11.2003. In support of his contention, the academic documents, Aadhar card, Dakhil Kharij register etc. were placed on record. He submits that the petitioner had submitted a representation along with affidavit to the respondent for correction in the mark sheet but the respondent/authority did not considered the same and he therefore submits that direction may be issued to the respondent NO.2 to consider the application of the petitioner and to make necessary correction in the date of birth in the mark sheet of the petitioner expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 submit that the Board in its meeting held on 28.02.2022 had resolved those applications for change in the date of birth in the mark sheets issued for classes 5th, 8th and 10th to be submitted to the Board within three years from the date of publication of the respective results. The petitioner in the instant case has approached the Board beyond the stipulated period of three years as such, the request for correction in the date of birth could not 3 be considered or entertained. 4. In view of the submissions of the counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file representation afresh and in the event of filing any such representation, the same shall be decided by the respondent No.2/Board in accordance with law within a period 8 weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.06.25 11:20:44 +0530