Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43947 (ALL)

SURESH MISTRI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/11954/2025 · 2025-04-21

Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:59823-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11954 of 2025 Petitioner :- Suresh Mistri Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neeraj Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushalendra Nath Singh Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State respondents and Shri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel for Noida. 2. The petitioner has raised a grievance with respect to allotment of vending zone. The petitioner has been operating business at vending zone situated in District Noida and claim his rights in respect of the said vending zone. Factual disputes being involved, matter may be more appropriately looked into by the Grievance Redressal Committee at district level constituted by the Noida Authority. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with the observation, in case petitioner approaches the Grievance Redressal Committee within a period of two weeks from today along with a copy of this order, that grievance may be addressed in accordance with law after affording due opportunity of hearing, as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two months therefrom. (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 22.4.2025 Jaideep/- Digitally signed by :- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad