APHC010147012014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 050 0S?^ MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 6856 OF 2014 Between: M/S. Chennai Network infrastructure LTD, SECBAD, Navaketan S.D.Road, Flat No.207-208, Opp. Clock Tower, Building, Secunderabad Rep. by its authorized signatory. ...Petitioner AND 1. The Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Represented by its Managing Director, Tenali, Guntur District. 2. The Divisional Engineer, The Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Tenali, Guntur District. 3. Tenali Municipality, Rep. by it's Commissioner, Tenali, Guntur District. 4. Ponnur Municipality, Rep. by it's Commissioner, Ponnur, Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in disconnecting the power supply to the towers erected by the petitioner company within the limits of the respondent municipality at the behest of the 3rd and the 4th Respondent, without issuing any prior notice and without following due process of law and the action of the 3rd and the 4th Respondent in issuing notice bearing Roc.No.3276/2008/G, dated 15.02.2014 and notice in Roc. NO.3319/2008/G1, dated 06.01.2014, asking the petitioner company to comply the conditions mentioned in G.O.Ms.No.380, dated 01.08.2013 in respect of towers erected prior to issuance of the said G.O. though it is not applicable to the existing towers, as, arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction and in violation of well settled principles of natural justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP 8485 OF 20141 Petition under Section 151 GPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the/petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd and the 4th Respondent not to take any coercive action for not complying with requirement of G.O.Ms.No.380, dated: 01.08.2013 to the existing towers erected by the petitioner company within the limits of the respondent municipality prior to issuance of the said G.O., pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP 8486 01= 20141 Petition under Section 151 OfH?’ praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd responent to restore the power supply to the towers erected by the petitioner company withiri the limits of the respondent municipalities, pending disposal of the writ petition. // / / / m / APHC010147012014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) BBS [3328] I MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 6856/2014 Between: 1.M/S. CHENNAI NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE LTD, SECBAD, NAVAKETAN BUILDING, FLAT NO.207-208, OPP. CLOCK TOWER, S.D.ROAD, SECUNDERABAD REP. SIGNATORY. BY ITS AUTHORIZED ! \ ...PETITIONER AND 1.MD APSPDCL GUNTUR DIST 3 OTHERS, LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, THE ANDHRA PRADESH SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3.TENALI MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY IT'S COMMISSIONER, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4.PONNUR MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY IT'S COMMISSIONER, PONNUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MOHD ISLAMUDDIN ANSARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): / / / f ■t / ( # Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHD ISLAMUDDIN ANSARI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: SRI V V SATHISH, (SC FOR APCPDCL) / Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: SRI K AISHWARYA CHOWDARY The Court made the following order: i { 1.- 2.P VINOD KUMAR 3. V R REDDY KOVVURI (SC FOR The Court made the foMowing ORAL islamuddin Ansari, Ld. Counsel for me Writ Teener that this Writ Petition has become ' ' 'nstructions, submits APCPDCL) ORDER; infructuous. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition infructuous. No order is disposed of as having become as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications If any, stand closed in terms of this order. Sd/- T. SRINIVASA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I M SECTION OFFICER To, 1- The Managing Director Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Company Limited, Tenali, Guntur District. 2. The Divisional Engineer Distribution The Andhra Pradesh r Tenali, Guntur District. Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, 3. The Commissioner, Tenali 4. The Commissioner Ponnur District. Municipality, Tenali, Guntur District. Municipality, Commissioner Ponnur, Guntur 5. One CC to Sri. Mohd Islamuddin 6- One CC to Sri. V.V.Sathish 7. OneCCtoSriK 8. Two CD Copies. Ansari Advocate [OPUC] (SC FOR APCPDCL) Advocate [OPUC] Aishwarya Chowdary, Advocate [OPUC]. AL \ \ \ \ % HIGH COURT \ DATED:04/08/2025 \ \ \ ORDER WP NO. 6856 OF 2014 «f'lTH0U??0™ INFRUCTUOUS, /