YUVRAJ GURJAR @ BHUNA S/O SHRI PRAKASH @ OMPRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14311/2025 · 2025-11-11
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43943 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43943 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:45296] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14311/2025 Yuvraj Gurjar @ Bhuna S/o Shri Prakash @ Omprakash, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Bhilot, P.s. Mandana, District Kota Rural (Raj.), At Present 311-12, Ajay Ahuja Nagar, P.s. Anantpura, Kota City (Raj.). (Accused At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 11/11/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.274/2024 registered at Police Station Jawahar Nagar (Kota City), District-Kota City for offences under Sections 103(1), 109(2), 111(4), 115(2), 126(2) and 189(2) of BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner’s name has not been mentioned in the FIR. He contends that the injured eyewitness has not mentioned his name in his statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS. He submits that on similar grounds, a Coordinate Bench of
[2025:RJ-JP:45296] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14311/2025] this Court granted bail to the co-accused Govind and Arjun Gurjar on 05.08.2025, and other co-accused-Tarun Chaudhary, Sunny Damor @ Agariya, and Deepak Singh @ Gajju @ Gajendra Singh were enlarged on bail by this Court on 28.10.2025. Petitioner is behind the bars since 05.03.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence on the ground of parity, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Yuvraj Gurjar @ Bhuna S/o Shri Prakash @ Omprakash shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/7