JAGATAPU VENKATA KRISHNA RAO(DIED) v. JAJAM USHA RANI
CRP/1398/2024 · 2025-04-22
Sumathi Jagadam
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43937 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43937 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRI^^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE Wl O /. o U ^7 * PRESENT THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1398 OF 2024 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the
Order, dated; 15/03/2024 passed in I.A. No. 141 of 2024 in O.S. No. 715 of 2015 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole. Between:
1. Jagatapu Venkata Krishna Rao, (Died)
2. Jagatapu Venkata Narasamma, W/o. Venkata Krishna Rao
3. Jagatapu Ramesh, S/o. Venkata Krishna Rao
4. Somasi Padmavathi, W/o. Srinivasa Rao All are residents of Sri Rama Colony, Kumool Road, Ongole, Prakasam District. ...Revision Petitioners/Defendants AND Jajam Usha Rani, W/o. Venkateswarlu, Hindu, House wife, aged about 42 years, R/o Revenue Colony, Kumool Road, Ongole, Prakasam District. ...Respondent/Plaintiff
lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S. No. 715 of 2015 on the file of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole during the pendency of CRP before this Hon’ble Court. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI PAVAN KUMAR PASUPULETI The Court made the following ORDER:
-■/ APHC010258612024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT [3459] THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1398/2024 Between: Jagatapu Venkata Krishna Rao(died) and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Jajam Usha Rani ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1 .VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA Counsel for the Respondent:
1.PAVAN KUMAR PASUPULETI
/ / 2 The Court made the following Order: The present Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 15.03.2024 passed by learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole, in I.A.No.141 of 2024 in O.S.No.715 of 2015. As can be seen from the report furnished by the District Judiciary, the main suit in O.S.No.715 of 2015 itself was dismissed as not pressed
2. on
06.09.2024. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed Sd/- P VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// IJ\ SECTfON OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole.
2. One CC to Sri. Venkata Durga Rao Anantha, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri. Pavan Kumar Pasupuleti, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies Chp sree
HIGH COURT DATED:23/04/2025
ORDER CRP.No.1398 of 2024 DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS