Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
127
MAMTA
STATE OF PUNJAB
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr
Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab
MANISHA BATRA
1. The present petition has been filed under Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for direction to the official respondents representation/complaint
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has that the petitione before the SHO, Police Station City Kharar, District SAS Nagar, Mohali (Annexure P-1) the same has not yet been considered and no further submitted that at this stage, the appropriate directions are issued to of Police, SAS Nagar, District SAS Nagar, Mohali representation filed by the petitioner and take
3. Notice of motion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M Date of decision:
Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab
****
MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short- the official respondents No.2 /complaint dated 14.11.2024 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has that the petitioner has recently filed a representation SHO, Police Station City Kharar, District SAS Nagar, Mohali ) raising her grievances as mentioned the same has not yet been considered and no action has further submitted that at this stage, the petitioner would appropriate directions are issued to respondent No. SAS Nagar, District SAS Nagar, Mohali representation filed by the petitioner and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.19574 of 2025 Date of decision: 08.04.2025
…. Petitioner
…. Respondents MANISHA BATRA
, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya -‘BNSS’) seeking issuance of 2 to 4 to take action on their Annexure P-1). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted recently filed a representation/complaint on 14.11.2024 SHO, Police Station City Kharar, District SAS Nagar, Mohali mentioned in the present petition but action has been taken thereon. He petitioner would be satisfied if respondent No. 3- Senior Superintendent SAS Nagar, District SAS Nagar, Mohali to decide the aforesaid necessary action thereon.
Bharatiya seeking issuance of their submitted 14.11.2024 SHO, Police Station City Kharar, District SAS Nagar, Mohali petition but He satisfied if Superintendent aid Jyoti 2025.04.09 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM
4. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her
5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation/complainant within a period of accordance with l
08.04.2025 Jyoti-IV
CRM-M No.19574 of 2025 Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent eedful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide /complainant dated 14.11.2024 ( period of 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. (MANISHA BATRA)
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No
M No.19574 of 2025 -2- Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab, who is present in accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits eedful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day.
In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid (Annexure P-1) of the petitioner from today, by passing a speaking order in (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in State and submits eedful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner, without
disposed the aforesaid of the petitioner from today, by passing a speaking order in Jyoti 2025.04.09 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document