HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15104/2025 Lalu Ram Yadav S/o Begraj Yadav, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Vil- lage Behroj, Tehsil Mundawar, District Khairthal- Tijara. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (R.s.r.t.c), Through Its Managing Director, Having Address At Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur- 302006. 2. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (R.s.r.t.c), Through Its Executive Director, Having Address At Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur- 302006. 3. Office Of Chief Manager, Rsrtc, Kotputli Depot, Through Its Chief Manager, Kotputli, District Kotputli- Behror. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Yaduvanshi For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 09/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 01.06.2023 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7984/2023 (Balkishan Vs. State of Rajasthan) and submits that the controversy raised herein is squarely covered by judgment in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8810/2014 (Tara Chand Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation), 25.01.2017 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and this writ petition may be disposed of accordingly. 2. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for petitioner and on perusal of judgment in case of Tara Chand Vs. (2 of 2) [CW-15104/2025] Rajasthan State Road Transport Corpo ration (supra), this writ petition may be disposed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation within a period of 4 weeks from today. 3. Having considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a fresh representation to respondents within a period of four weeks from today raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to consider the representation and decide with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation, in light of principle of law as laid down in case of Tara Chand (supra). After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. Needless to say that if principle of law as laid down in case of Tara Chand (supra) is applicable, then petitioner is entitled to benefit in accordance with terms of judgment. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he may re-approach the court with fresh petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petitions with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J Chetna Behrani/59