IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 205 RSA No. 502 of 2001 (O&M) Date of decision:20th May, 2025 Tarsem Lal Jindal ..Appellant Versus The Punjab State Electricity Board, The Mall, Patiala through its Secretary and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA. Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Deep Inder Singh Walia, Advocate for respondents. SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J(Oral) 1. This case pertains to the year 2001 and falls in the category of old cases. 2. As per the file, none has put in appearance on behalf of appellant since July 2023. 3. On the last date of hearing i.e. on 10.02.2025, the Registry was directed to inform the appellant and respondents as well as their counsel. 4. As per report of Registry, the sole appellant in the present appeal has died. 5. Today none has put in appearance on behalf of appellant. 6. No application for bringing on record the legal representatives of the appellant has been filed. 7. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 8. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 9. However, liberty is reserved to the legal representatives of appellant to move an application to revive the appeal in case any cause of action survives. 10. Pending application (s) if any also stand disposed off. 20th May, 2025 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) reema JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No REEMA SAINI 2025.05.22 10:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh