SATENDRA SINGH AND ANR. v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 ORS.
WRIA/34101/2016 · 2025-02-07
Ajay Bhanot
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43919 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43919 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 34101 of 2016 Petitioner :- Satendra Singh And Anr. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Rohit Nandan Pandey,Sanjeev Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Yadav,C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Matter is listed under the heading of cases likely to have become infructuous (efflux of time). Matter is taken up in the revised call. None appears to press the writ petition. Names of the counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel for the respondent are shown in the cause list. It is evident that the petitioner does not have any interest in prosecuting the writ petition, as the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Dhananjai Digitally signed by :- DHANANJAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad