Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43912 (PNJ)

DEEPAK KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/19584/2025 · 2025-04-09

Anoop Chitkara

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-19584-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 142 CRM-M-19584-2025 Date of Decision: 09.04.2025 Deepak Kumar ...Peoner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Sukhdev Singh, A.A.G, Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. Present peon has been filed under Secon 528 of BNSS, 2023 for issuance of direcons to respondents No. 2 and 3 to take strict legal acon against respondent No. 6, who is blackmailing the peoner by filing false criminal complaints against him in revenge of complaints submi3ed against him by respondent No. 5-Society, where the peoner’s father is designated as Chairman. 2. At the outset, counsel for the peoner submits that he would be contended and sasfied if direcons are issued to decide representaon dated 21.03.2025 (Annexure P-4) within the me bound manner. 3. Noces are served upon the official respondents through the State's counsel. Given the nature of the order that this Court proposes to pass, neither the response of official respondents nor the issuance of noces to the private respondents is required. 4. Let the representaon dated 21.03.2025 (Annexure P-4) be decided by the concerned Senior Superintendent of Police, by 30.04.2025, either himself/herself or by authorizing and delegang it to any officer holding IPS cadre. It is clarified that such order must be a reasoned order, and the same be communicated to the representaonists as well as his counsel without delay. 5. Liberty reserved to the peoner to file fresh peon or to take other legal remedies in accordance with the law. JYOTI 2025.04.10 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-19584-2025 2 6. It is clarified that there is no adjudicaon on merits. It is further clarified that this order shall not come in the way if the interrogaon of the peoner is required in any cognizable case. 7. There would be no need for a cerfied copy of this order, and any Advocate for the Peoner and State can download this order and other relevant parculars from the official web page of this court and aest it to be a true copy. The concerned officer can also verify its authencity and may download and use the downloaded copy for immediate use. Pe,,on is allowed to the extent men,oned above. All pending applicaons, if any, stand disposed. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 09.04.2025 Jyo-II Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No. JYOTI 2025.04.10 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.