RAJEEV KUMAR DHAWAN v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (STATE TAX) STATE TAX DIVISION- SECTOR 12 NOIDA GST BHAWAN AND 2 OTHERS
WTAX/2207/2025 · 2025-05-26
Arun Bhansali, Kshitij Shailendra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43912 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43912 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:89911-DB Chief Justice's Court Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 2207 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Dhawan Security Agency Respondent :- Assistant Commissioner (State Tax) State Tax Division- Sector 12 Noida Gst Bhawan and 2 others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harsh Vardhan Gupta, Vivek Sarin Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., Ankur Agarwal (S.C.) Hon'ble Arun Bhansali,Chief Justice Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
1. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it remains undisputed that the petitioner's registration under the UPGST Act, 2017 was cancelled on 26.07.2022 w.e.f. 01.07.2022. It is not the case of the revenue that the said registration has ever been revived or that the petitioner ever sought revival of that registration.
2. In view of the above, it does merit acceptance that the petitioner was not obligated to visit the GST portal to receive the show cause notices that may have been issued to the petitioner for 2019-20 through e-mode, preceding the adjudication orders dated 24.08.2024 & 31.08.2024 passed in pursuance thereto.
3. It is also not the case of the revenue that any physical/offline notice was issued to or served on the petitioner before the impugned order came to be passed.
4. In view of peculiar facts noted above, no useful purpose may be served in keeping the petition pending or calling counter affidavit at this stage or to relegate the present petitioner to the forum of alternative remedy.
5. Since essential requirement of rules of natural justice has
remained to be fulfilled, we set aside the orders dated 24.08.2024 & 31.08.2024. The petitioner may submit its reply to the show cause notice within a period of four weeks from today. Subject to such compliance by the petitioner, fresh order may be passed after affording opportunity of personal hearing, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months therefrom.
6. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 27.5.2025 RK/Jyotsana (Kshitij Shailendra, J) (Arun Bhansali, CJ) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad