-1- W.P. No.35756 of 2025 Date of order:24.12.2025 APHC010677172025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 35756/2025 Between: 1. ADDA NAGESWARAMMA, W/O. SRI SATYA VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED 64 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. 8-79, MAIN ROAD, AKIVEEDU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. MUNAGALA LAKSHMI SARASWATHI,, W/O. VEERA VENKATA SUBRAMANYAM ANJANEYA PRASAD, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, RIO. H.NO.7-30-7/1, MOTUMARRI VAN-STREET, GANGAMMA PETA, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. -522237 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARASARAOPET.-522601 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARASARAOPET. -522016 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARASARAOPET DIVISION, PALNADU DISTRICT. -522601 5. THE TAHSILDAR, CHILAKALURIPETA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. -522016 6. KASINA VENKATA NAGARAJU ADDA NAGARAJU, S/O. VENKATASWAMI, AGED 45 YEARS, RIO. FLOT NO. 305, B-BLOCK, SILVER SPRINGS APARTMENTS, QUTHUBULLAPUR, MEDCHAL -2- W.P. No.35756 of 2025 Date of order:24.12.2025 DISTRICT, TELANGANA. -501401 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents particularly 3rd Respondent in non-deciding the Revision Petition, dated 15.09.2025 filed by the Petitioners against the proceedings made by the 5th Respondent whereby mutating the name of 6th Respondent in record of rights connected to Petitioners joint family properties admeasuring Ac. 2.16 Cents comprising Ac.1.57 Cents and Ac. 0.59 Cents respectively covered by Sy. Nos. 658 and 772-C of Pasumarru Village, Chilakaluripeta Mandal, Palnadu District, Erstwhile Guntur District, without considering their entitlement and share, in contravention of law laid by the full bench of this Honble Court in Chinnam Pandurangam v. Mandal Revenue Officer and Ors. cited as 2007 (6) ALD 348 (FB), as illegal, irregular, irrational and non to non-discharge of legal obligation conferred on him/her under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to number and decide said Revision Petition in accordance with law and pass orders in accordance with law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of entries in record of rights recorded in favour of 6th Respondent connected to Petitioners’ joint family properties admeasuring Ac. 2.16 Cents comprising Ac.1.57 Cents and Ac. 0.59 Cents respectively covered by Sy. No’s. 658 and 772-C of Pasumarru Village, Chilakaluripeta Mandal, Palnadu District, Erstwhile Guntur District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SITA RAM CHAPARLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: -3- W.P. No.35756 of 2025 Date of order:24.12.2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION No.35756 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The writ petition is filed for the following relief: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of Respondents particularly 3rd Respondent in non-deciding the Revision Petition, dated 15.09.2025 filed by the Petitioners against the proceedings made by the 5th Respondent whereby mutating the name of 6th Respondent in record of rights connected to Petitioners joint family properties admeasuring Ac. 2.16 Cents comprising Ac.1.57 Cents and Ac. 0.59 Cents respectively covered by Sy. Nos. 658 and 772-C of Pasumarru Village, Chilakaluripeta Mandal, Palnadu District, Erstwhile Guntur District, without considering their entitlement and share, in contravention of law laid by the full bench of this Honble Court in Chinnam Pandurangam v. Mandal Revenue Officer and Ors. cited as 2007 (6) ALD 348 (FB), as illegal, irregular, irrational and non to non-discharge of legal obligation conferred on him/her under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to number and decide said Revision Petition in accordance with law and pass orders in accordance with law…” 2. Considering the submissions, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the case. Hence, notice to the respondents is dispensed with. 3. As admitted by the learned Government Pleader, the revision is pending before the 3rd respondent. The learned Government Pleader has pointed out certain defects in the revision. The fact remains that the revision was filed by the petitioner on 15.09.2025 and despite the efforts of the petitioner, it has not been taken up so far. -4- W.P. No.35756 of 2025 Date of order:24.12.2025 4. In view of the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider the revision filed by the petitioner. If any lapses are found, following the due process of law, the 3rd respondent may have rectified such defects either by the petitioner or by the concerned officers, and decide the revision within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH BV