[2025:RJ-JP:48151] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal 2nd Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13299/2025 Azad S/o Deena, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bikti Police Station Bichhor District Nuh Mewat Haryana (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal 2nd Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13527/2025 Jilsad @ Dildad S/o Samsu @ Shambhu, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Jurharee, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg. (At Present In Sub Jail Deeg, Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Liyakat Khan Mr. Harendra Singh with Mr. Mahaveer Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. The 2nd bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Azad S/o Deena and Jilsad @ Dildad S/o Samsu @ Shambhu seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.189/2023 dated 28.05.2023 registered at P.S. Pahari, District Bharatpur for the offence under Sections 392, 307, 379 and 411 of IPC. [2025:RJ-JP:48151] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-13299/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against them is complete and they are no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicants accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicants undertake not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for applicants submits that first bail application was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file after filing of charge-sheet. He also submits that now, a charge-sheet has been filed against the applicants. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Jilsad @ Dildad submits that 6 criminal cases were registered against Jilsad @ Dildad, whereas counsel for Azad submits that 17 criminal cases registered against Azad. Learned counsel further submits that main accused is Akram, who was granted bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court on 03.07.2023. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Jilsad submits that this applicant is already released on bail in remaining cases, whereas learned counsel appearing on behalf of Azad submits that the applicant is on bail in other cases, but details are not available with him. 5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. [2025:RJ-JP:48151] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-13299/2025] 7. On basis of report dated 28.05.2023 lodged by Pratap Singh (Sub-Inspector) against Akram, Jilsad and Azad about assault and robbery in the evening of 27.05.2023, a report is registered at P.S. Pahari, District Bharatpur and during investigation, accused Akram was arrested on 28.05.2023 and he was granted bail by a Coordinate Bench on 03.07.2023. After filing of charge-sheet against Akram, the investigation was kept pending against Jilsad and Azad, but after arrest of Jilsad and Azad on 13.02.2025 and 25.07.2025 respectively, police has filed a charge-sheet against them as well. 8. There are 6 criminal cases against Jilsad, whereas 17 criminal cases against Azad. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Jilsad has submitted details of 6 criminal cases, whereas no details were filed in respect of Azad. 9. Considering the criminal background and regular involvement of Azad in different criminal cases, it is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant-Azad on bail, but Jilsad @ Dildad is entitled to be released on bail, in parity with Akram. 10. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused Jilsad is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-accused Jilsad @ Dildad. [2025:RJ-JP:48151] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-13299/2025] 11. Thus, the 2nd bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Jilsad @ Dildad S/o Samsu @ Shambhu, is hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 12. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. 13. In view of discussion made herein above, 2nd application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS preferred by Azad S/o Deena, is hereby dismissed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /108-109