APHC010575972013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH^ AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE v PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 32889 OF 2013 Between: M/s. Sri Rayalaseema Alkalies & Allied Chemicals Limited, Having its Registered Office & Factory at Gandiparla Village, Kurnool, Kurnool District Rep. by its Executive Director: Mr. K. Karunakar Rao. ...Petitioner'" AND 1. A. P. Electricity Regulatory Commission, rep. its Secretary, A.P. Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, Hyderabad. 2. The Central Power Distribution Company of, A.P. Limited, rep. by its Managing Director, Mint Compound, Hyderabad. 3. The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, The Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited, Kurnool, Kurnool District. 4. The Senior Accounts Officer, Operation Circle, The Central Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited, Kurnool, Kurnool District."-^ 5. The Government of A P rep by its Principal, Secretary to Govt., Energy Department, A.P. Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226^"^the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order of direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring (a) the order dated 12-3-2013 passed by the 1® respondent in O.P. No. 83/2012 as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and without jurisdiction and (b) demand and collection of FSA charges relating 2"^^ quarter of 2012-13 by the 2 to nd respondent by including FSA charges in the as highly illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and contrary to Clauses 9 and 10 of the Regulation No. 45- B of the A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulation, 1999 and consequently set aside the monthly bills of March, May and June, 2013 same. lA NO: 1 OF 2013rWPMP 40904 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the Fligh Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the writ petition by fixing an early date of hearing. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. HEMANTH FOR SRI D. V. NAGARJUNA BABU ^ Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI P. SRINIVAS, SC FOR APERC Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : SRI VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : GP FOR ENERGY The Court made the following order: v'' APHC010575972013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 32889/2013 Between; 1.M/S. SRI RAYALASEEMA ALKALIES & ALLIED CHEMICALS LIMITED, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE & FACTORY AT GANDIPARLA VILLAGE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT REP. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: MR. K. KARUNAKAR RAO, BY ITS ...PETITIONER AND 1.A P ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, A.P. SINGARENI BHAVAN, RED HILLS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF, LIMITED, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MINT COMPOUND HYDERABAD. 3.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION CIRCLE, THE CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4.THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER, OPERATION CIRCLE CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5.THE GOVERNMENT OF A P REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY A.P. SECRETARIAT, A.P. THE TO GOVT., ENERGY DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution c circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith pleased toto ‘ of India praying that in the nature of Writ'oTlndTlTdeT' "^“^^'p^^l^l^oneTthl by the 1st relpondennn O P No 83/^0 r VVT and without jurisdiction and fh^ w ^ '9*^*y'l*®gol. arbitrary, unjust to 2nd quarter of "o 2 13 charges relating B of the AP Electriritv ^ ^ ReguJation No. 45- nwidd, ..».ddd.;Cn“2..rhr" lA NO: 1 OF 20l3rWPMP 4nQnzL qf in same 2013 expedite the hearing of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.D VNAGARJUNA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR 2.GP FOR ENERGY The Court made the following ORDER: Sri V.Hemanth, learned counsel representing Sri D.V.Nagarjun Babu learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. may be pleased to by fixing an early date of hearing. APSPDCL 2. Recording the submission of learned > petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order Miscellaneous petitions pending counsel for the petitioner, the writ as to costs. if any, shall st^nd closed. ASsIstaS? RAO assistant Reg'I^r SECTION OFFICER //true copy// To, 2. One CC to Iri Vei^k'ate 3. Two CCS to GP for Erernr«r^^°*^®‘=f°'''APSPDCL [OPUCI t T°w: CD C°op"r SC a'pTrc tOUTJ •> HIGH COURT DATED;09/07/2025 ^^Tofano;^ Mo I f 3 OCT 2025 ORDER WP NO. 32889 OF 2013 V oa. DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS