Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4390 (RAJ)

MOHAMMAD ZAMEEL S/O SHRI AJMERI KHAN v. RAVINDRA CHOUDHARY S/O SHRI HARISH CHANDRA CHOUDHARY

CW/1303/2025 · 2025-01-29

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4078] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1303/2025 1. Mohammad Zameel S/o Shri Ajmeri Khan, R/o Plot No. 237, Badodiya Basti, Station Road, Jaipur (Died During Pendency of Plaint) 1/1 Javed S/o Mohd. Zameel Khan, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Plot No. 237, Badodiya Basti, Station Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner/Defendant Versus Ravindra Choudhary S/o Shri Harish Chandra Choudhary, R/o Plot No. 112, 2Nd Floor, Narendra Nagar, Swej Farm, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent/Plaintiff For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Kant Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 29/01/2025 1. Petitioner-defendant has filed instant writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, impugning the order dated 04.01.2025 passed in Civil Suit No.25/2023 (253/2015) titled as ‘Ravindra Choudhary Vs. Mohd. Zameel’ by the Court of Additional Civil Judge No.4, Jaipur, allowing application filed under Order 7 Rule 14(3) read with Section 151 CPC filed by the respondent- plaintiff, to place statement of his bank account for the year 2012 on record in the present suit for specific performance. 2. Having heard the counsel for petitioner and from perusal of the record, it appears that the documents in question is relevant to the issue involved in the present suit for specific performance [2025:RJ-JP:4078] (2 of 2) [CW-1303/2025] and document is bank statement of the year 2012, which is a genuine document, hence, the trial Court has not committed any jurisdictional error in allowing the application. 3. This Court, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, does not find any jurisdictional error on the part of the trial Court, hence, no interference is warranted in the impugned order dated 04.01.2025. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is hereby dismissed. 5. All pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/58