I IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11187 OF Between: 1. Satti Subba Reddy, S/o Veer Reddy, aged 63 years, R/o D.No 2-202, Shivalayam Street, Balabadhrapuram Village, Bikkavolu Mandal Godavari District. , East 2. Satti Vijaya Lakshmi, W/o Satti Subba Reddy, aged 60 years, R/o D.No 2-202, Shivalayam Street, Balabadhrapuram Village, Bikkavolu Mandal, East Godavari District. 3. Yella Sesharatnam, W/o Sattilingam, aged 57 years, R/o D.No 2-106, Kummara Veedhi, Balabadhrapuram Village, Bikkavolu Godavari District. Mandal, East 4. Yella Butchilingam, S/o Veerayya, aged 64 years, R/o D.No 2 -107, Kummara Veedhi, Balabadhrapuram Village, Bikkavolu Mandal, East Godavari District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 3. The Joint Collector, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 5. The Tahsildar, Bikkavolu Mandal, East Godavari District. 6. The District Registrar, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 7. The Sub-registrar, Bikkavolu Sub-Registrar Office District. East Godavari ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring a) the action of the 5'^^ Respondent in not making sub-divisions to the lands belonging to the petitioners in an extent of Ac. 1.91 more cents in S.No 529/3, situated at Balabadrapuram Village, Bikkavolu Mandal East Godavari District by correcting the revenue entries as per the order of 3'" Respondent vide Ref.Cord-3/485833/2024 dated 13.03.2024. and b) the action of the 6 and 7'" respondents in not deieting Sy.no 529/3, Ac. 1.98 cents from 22A list of Balabhadrapuram Village, Bikkavolu Mandal despite that effect from the 2"‘^ Respondent vide Ref. Lands 08.10.2023, th a direction to -3/471414/2023 dated unjust, without and 3'“'^ Respondents and Ref.Cord- principles of natural justice besides the Constitution of India and correct the entries as per the Lands -3/471414/2023 13.03.2024. wholly illegal, arbitrary, irrational jurisdiction, violation of the Orders passed by the 2 Ref. as nd Lands 3/471414/2023 dated 08.10.2023 3/485833/2024 dated 13.03.2024 being violative of Article 14 and 300-A of consequently direct the respondents to Orders of the 2^^^^ and 3'^^ Respondents vide Ref. dated 08.10.2023 and Ref.Cord-3/485833/2024 dated lA NO: 1 OF 2()9R Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in pleased to direct the support of the petition, the High Court may be respondents to consider the representation dated 07.04.2025 by correcting the entries in the revenue records as per the Orders of the 2"^ and 3 ' Respondents vide Ref. Lands - 3/471414/2023 dated 08.10.2023 and Ref.Cord-3/485833/2024 dated 13.03.2024. Counsel for the Petitioner; SRI T S B V RAMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7: REGISTRATION GP FOR STAMPS & The Court made the following: ::1:: APHC0i0223492025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11187/2025 Between: Satti Subba Reddy and Others ...PETITIONER{S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.TSBVRAMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS ...RESPONDENT(S) ' % 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENAKTESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION N0.11187 of 2025 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution 1. of India seeking the following relief; “..to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring a the action of the 5th Respondent in not making subdivisions to the lands belonging to the petitioners in an extent of Ac.1.91 cents in S.No.529/3 situated at Balabadrapuram Village Bikkavolu Mandal East Godavari District by correcting the revenue entries as per the order of 3rd Respondent vide Ref Cord3/485833/2024 dated 13 03 2024 and b the action of the 6th and 7th respondents in not deleting Sy.No.529/3 Ac 1 98 cents from 22A list of Balabhadrapuram Village Bikkavolu Mandal despite a direction to that effect from the 2dd Respondent vide Ref Lands 3/471414/2023 dated 08 10 2023 as wholly illegal arbitrary irrational unjust without jurisdiction violation of the Orders passed by the 2nd and 3rd Respondents Ref Lands 3/471414/2023 dated 08 10 2023 and Ref Cord3/485833/2024 dated 13 03 2024 principles of natural justice besides being violative of Article 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to correct the entries as per the Orders of the 2nd and 3rd Respondents vide Ref Lands 3/471414/2023 dated 08 10 2023 and Ref Cord3/485833/2024 dated 13 03 2024 and pass...” 2. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioners are owners of separate extents of land, collectively admeasuring to an extent of Ac. 1.91 cents in Survey No. 529/3, situated at Balabhadrapuram Village, Bikkavolu Mandal, East Godavari District. The petitioners submitted representations to the respondent authorities, i.e., respondent Nos. 3 to 5, requesting for bifurcation and subdivision of the subject land among themselves and for de-notification of the land from the Prohibitory list under Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 1908. Considering the representations of the petitioners, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 issued proceedings dated 08.10.2023 and 13.03.2024, respectively, directing respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to redress the grievance of the petitioners and to delete the subject land from the prohibitory list. In compliance with these directions, the petitioners submitted a further representation dated 07.04.2025 to the 5th respondent, requesting for implementation of the orders passed by the 2nd and 3rd respondents, and for updating the revenue records and the remarks column to reflect that the land has been denotified under Section 22-A. However, despite the clear directions issued by respondent Nos. 2 and 3 through the proceedings dated 08.10.2023 and and despite the receipt of the petitioners’ individual 13.03.2024 4 representation dated 07.04.2025, respondent Nos. 4 and 5 have neither considered the representation nor complied with the directions. Hence, the present writ petition. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government 3. Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondents, submits that in view of the directions issued by the 2nd and 3rd respondents through proceedings dated 08.10.2023 and 13.03.2024, directing the 4th and 5th respondents to redress the grievance of the petitioners with respect to the subject property, the 4th and 5th respondents will consider the representation of the petitioners I comply with the directions issued by respondent Nos. 2 and 3, and ( pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned 4. Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned 5. counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, and upon perusal of the material available on record, this Court is of the considered opinion that the present writ petition can be disposed of by directing the 5th respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 07.04.2025, with 5 reference to the orders passed by the 2nd and 3rd respondents, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and other stakeholders, if any, within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of, with 6. the consent of both the counsel. No costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications if any pending, shall Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 1. The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 3. The Joint Collector, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 5. The Tahsildar, Bikkavolu Mandal, East Godavari District. 6. The District Registrar, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 7. The Sub-registrar, Bikkavolu Sub-Registrar Office, East Godavari District. 8. One CC to SRI. T S B V RAMA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 9. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Two CCs to GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Three CD Copies To, Revenue 10. 11. sree HIGH COURT DATED:30/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.11187 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS