Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43896 (RAJ)

KAMLESH NAGAR v. SUMANT NAGAR AND ORS

CW/2381/2018 · 2025-11-13

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45657] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2381/2018 Kamlesh Nagar, Son of Late Shri Mishri Lal Ji Nagar, aged about 61 years, Resident of SF-II, Neelkanth Apartment, A-164, Ramesh Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. Sumant Nagar, Son of Late Shri Mishri Lal Ji Nagar, Resident of Plot No. 16, Durgapura, Near Pani Ki Tanki, Tonk Road, Jaipur 2. Madhusudan Nagar, Son of Late Shri Mishri Lal Ji Nagar, Resident of G-3, Geejgarh House, Nandpuri, Hawa Sadak, Jaipur 3. Chandrash Nagar, Son of Late Shri Mishri Lal Ji Nagar, Resident of G-3, Geejgarh House, Nandpuri, Hawa Sadak, Jaipur 4. Aashish Nagar, Son of Late Shri Ramesh Nagar, Resident of G-3, Geejgarh House, Nandpuri, Hawa Sadak, Jaipur ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2392/2018 Kamlesh Nagar, Son of Late Shri Mishri Lal Ji Nagar, aged about 61 years, Resident of SF-II, Neelkanth Apartment, A-164, Ramesh Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. Sumant Nagar, Son of Late Shri Mishri Lal Ji Nagar, Resident of Plot No 16, Durgapura, Near Pani Ki Tanki, Tonk Road, Jaipur 2. Madhusudan Nagar, Son of Late Shri Mishri Lal Ji Nagar, Resident of G-3, Geejgarh House, Nandpuri, Hawa Sadak, Jaipur 3. Chandrash Nagar, Son of Late Shri Mishri Lal Ji Nagar, Resident of G-3, Geejgarh House, Nandpuri, Hawa Sadak, Jaipur 4. Aashish Nagar, Son of Late Shri Ramesh Nagar, Resident of G-3, Geejgarh House, Nandpuri, Hawa Sadak, Jaipur [2025:RJ-JP:45657] (2 of 2) [CW-2381/2018] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohd. Adil For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 13/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions of his client, submits that during the pendency of the present writ petitions, a compromise has already been arrived at between the parties and therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petitions. 2. Permission sought for is granted. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. 4. All other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /100-101