Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43894 (AP)

BARRI TEJESWANI @ BARRE TEJASWINI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/4525/2025 · 2025-04-24

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE I'. PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N I.A Nos. 1 and 2 of 2025 in/and CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4525 OF 2025 Between: 1. Barri Tejeswani @ Barre Tejaswini, W/o.Veeraraghavapuram Sudhakar, Aged about 23 years, Occ BPO, R/o. Hanuman Nagar, Venkatagiri Town Tirupathi District. 2. Ganipalli Vardhan @ Ganipalli Vardhan, S/o. Yona, Aged about 26 years, Occ Private Employee, R/o. Madugula Village, Gurijala Mandal, Palnadu District. 3. . Didugu Venkata Lakshmi Narasimha Rao @ Dugudu Venkata Lakshmi Narasimha Rao,, S/o. Late Indusekhara Rao, aged about 54 years, Occ Medical Practitioner, R/o.D.No. 11-3-280, Police Quarters Line, Behind RTC Bus Stand, Macharla Town and Mandal, Palnadu District. ...Petitioner/Accused 1 to 3 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, through SHO, Venkatagiri Police Station, Tirupathi District, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Nelapadu Amaravati. ...Respondent / 2. Veeraraghavapuram Sudhakar,, S/o. Dasaradha Reddy Aged about 29 - years, Occ Software Engineer, R/o.D.No.1-60/A, Mutchivolu Village, Sri I Kalahasti Mandal, Tirupati District. ...Respondent/Defacto Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C (528 of BNSS, 2023) praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings against the petitioners in PRC.No.05 of 2025 on the file of the Hon ble Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Venkatagiri, Tirupathi District in Cr. No. 108 of 2023, dated 04.03.2023 of Venkatagiri Police Station, Tirupathi District. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 320(6) of Cr.P.C (359(6) of BNSS ) praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit petitioners to compound the offence U/Sec.498, 419, 417, 315, 318 r/w 34 of IPC in PRC.No.05 of 2025 on the file of the Hon’ble Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Venkatagiri, Tirupathi District in Cr. No. 108 of 2023, dated 04.03.2023 of Venkatagiri Police Station, Tirupathi District I.A. NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 320(2) of Cr.P.C (359(2) of BNSS) praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise and quash the PRC.No.05 of 2025 on the file of the Hon’ble Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Venkatagiri, Tirupathi District in Cr. No. 108 of 2023, dated 04.03.2023 of Venkatagiri Police Station, Tirupathi District i •W * I.A. NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in PRC.No.05 of 2025 on the file of the Hon’ble Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Venkatagiri, Tirupathi District, pending disposal of the criminal petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P Narahari Babu, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and Sri M.K Raj Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant The Court made the following order: APHC010213762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY .THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4525/2025 [3457] Between: Barri Tejeswani @ Barre Tejaswini and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.P NARAHARI BABU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.M KRAJ KUMAR 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 2 CRL.P. No.4525 OF 2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N I.A. Nos.1 and 2 OF 2025 IN/AND rpiMiMAi PFTITION No.4525 of 2025 COMMON ORDERl and the learned counsel for 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners the 2"'^ respondent/de amicably settled their dispute 202^^, accompanying the complainant and the joint memo Court to allow the petitioners compound the offence under 34 of the Indian Penal Code in P.R.C. No.5 of 2025 on facto complainant submit that the parties have and have filed I.A. Nos.1 and 2 of affidavit of the 2"^ respondent/ de facto of this seeking the permission and the de facto complainant to \ Sections498, 419, 417, 315, 318 read 1860 registered against the the file of the Judicial with petitioners Magistrate 2. The petitioners and the 2 of First Class, Venkatagiri, Tirupati District, respondent/de facto complainant are identified by the respective nd present in the Court. The parties were counsel and identity cards of both the parties were verified. 3. The 2"^^ respondent wishers, he has petitioners. He further confirmed that the compromise was reached voluntarily, without coercion or undue influence. submitsthat, pursuant to the intervention of well- made against the withdrawn the allegations 3 CRLP. No.4525 OF 2025 4. Recording the submissions of the 2"^^ respondent, I.A. Nos.1 and 2 ' ^ of 2025 are allowed and the proceedings in P.R.C. No.5 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Venkatagiri, Tirupati District,against the petitioners for the offences under Sections 498 419, 417, 315, 318 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code 1860,are hereby quashed. 5. Accordingly, the criminal petition is allowed. 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition shall stand closed. Sd/- SHAIK MOHAMMED RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / s J //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Venkatagiri, Tirupathi District 2. The Station House Officer, Venkatagiri Police Station, Tirupathi District 3. One CC to Sri. P Narahari Babu Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri. M.K Raj Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi [OUT] 6. Three CD Copies 7. Along with joint memo filed in I.A No.2 of 2025 stu 1 HIGH COURT DATED:25/04/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.4525 of 2025 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI I.A. NO. OF 2025 / IN CRLP.NO. OF 2025 Between; 1. Barri Tejeswani @ Barre Tejaswini, W/o.Veeraraghapuram Sudhakar, Aged about 23 years, Occ; BPO, R/o. Hanuman Nagar. Venkatagiri Town, Tirupathi District. Ganipalli Vardhan @ Ganipalli Vardhan, S/o. Yona Aged about 26 years, Occ: Private Employee, R/o. Madugula Village, Gurijaia Mandal, Palnadu District. 2. 3. Didugu Venkata Lakshmi Narasimha Rao @ Dugudu Venkata Lakshmi Narasimha Rao, S/o. Late Indusekhara Rao, aged about 54 years Occ; Medical Practitioner, R/o.D.No. 11-3-280, Police Quarters Line, Behind RTC Bus Stand,’ Macharla Town & Mandal, Palnadu District. ... Petitioners/Accused 1 to 3 And 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, through SHO, Venkatagiri Police Station, Tirupathi District, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court at Nelapadu, Amaravati. ... Respondent Vc-x 2. Veeraraghapuram Sudhakar, S/o. Dasaradha Reddy, Aged about 29 years, Occ: Software Engineer, R/o.D.No. 1-60/A, Mutchivolu Village, Sri Kalahasti Mandal, Tirupati District. ... Respondent/ Defacto Complainant L I 0 JOINT MEMO It is submitted that the petitioner/2"'^ respondent herein filed the present Joint Memo to compound the offences between the defacto complainant/2"'^ respondent and the petitioners as the matter is settled out of court amicably. \* I submit that at the instance of elders and well wishers all the parties including all of us have come to a conclusion to settle the disputes pending before the court as such we have filed the petition seeking Hon’ble Court to record the compromise, the content mentioned in said compromise petition are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, the said compromise is entered with free will and consent and without any undue influence from any one. Hence we are filing the present Joint Memo. I Amaravati Dated; '^r^J^^f^tioners Counsel f y Counsel Respondents 2 Respondent (Veeraraghapuram Sudhakar) Petitioners/Accused (Barri Tejeswani @ Barre Tejaswini) 1. (Ganipalli Vardhan @ Ganipalli Vardhan) 2.( T (Didugu Venkata Lakshmi Narasimha Rao @ Dugudu Venkata Lakshmi Narasimha Rao) 3.