Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43890 (RAJ)

SUKHDEV SINGH S/O SHRI RUGHA SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18071/2025 · 2025-11-26

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48051] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18071/2025 Sukhdev Singh S/o Shri Rugha Singh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Shiv Singh Pura Post Kudli Tehsil And District Sikar Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director Sainik Welfare Department, Rajasthan Jaipur 2. The District Sainik Welfare Officer, Sikar District Sikar Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Judgment / Order 26/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, humbly prayed that this writ petition filed by the present petitioner may kindly been allowed and the impugned order dated 25.01.2023 passed by the respondent- Authority may kindly been quashed and set aside and further the respondent may kindly been directed to allow the petitioner on the pot of Officer In charge, Sainik Rest House, Sikar with all benefit in the interest of justice” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file [2025:RJ-JP:48051] (2 of 2) [CW-18071/2025] an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /121