[2025:RJ-JP:27813] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 235/2019 Jagdish Prasad Meena @ J. P. Meena S/o Shri Banshi Ram Meena, Aged About 58 Years, The Then Additional Director State Insurance And Gpf Department Jaipur Raj. At Present R/o M-5 M L A Quarter Gandhi Nagar Jaipur Raj. Permanent R/o Vill. Nangalsohan P.o. Kanety Teh. Rajgarh Dist. Alwar Raj. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Raj. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2350/2018 Surendra Metha S/o Shri Ugam Raj Mehta, R/o 501 Dipti Parel J B Nagar Andheri (East) Mumbai Presently Working As Ceo Uib India Pvt. Ltd. 707 ,215 Atrium Andheri Kurla Road Andheri East Mumbai ----Petitioner Versus Central Bureau Of Investigation, Through Its Special Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Raj Bajwa, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amar Kumar Mr. Girish Khandelwal with Ms. Swati Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prashant Chaturvedi, Special PP with Ms. Nandini Chaturvedi Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/07/2025 1. These two revision petitions were preferred by petitioners accused aggrieved and dissatisfied from order dated 05.12.2018 in criminal case no. 17/2018 (8/2015) passed by learned Special Judge, CBI no.4, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur [2025:RJ-JP:27813] (2 of 2) [CRLR-235/2019] 2. Heard submissions of learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of appellant accused Surendra Metha and learned counsel appearing for petitioner Jagdish Prasad @ J.P. and learned Special Public Prosecutor for respondent(s). 3. During course of argument, learned Special Public Prosecutor has apprised the Court that after framing of charge, the prosecution evidence has commenced and till date 12 witnesses were already examined by prosecution and only 50 more witnesses are left. He further submits that CBI is trying its level best to conclude remaining witnesses as early as possible. He further submits that since the matter is pending before this Hon’ble Court for last 6 or 7 years then in such a case, if the petitioners may raise these ground before the trial court under the law at appropriate stage, then, these revision petitions can be disposed of. 4. During course of argument, learned Senior Advocate and learned counsel for petitioners agreed to the suggestion of learned Special Public Prosecutor. 5. In view of discussion and deliberations during course of arguments, both the revision petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioner(s) to raise all these grounds, during course of trial at any appropriate stage under the appropriate provision of law. 6. With aforesaid, the revision petition and misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /46-47