Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43888 (KAR)

KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAMA LIMITED v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

MFA/104602/2024 · 2025-03-10

Umesh M Adiga

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4551 MFA No. 104602 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 104602 OF 2024 (LAC) BETWEEN: KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAMA LIMITED, BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SINGATALURU LIFT IRRIGATION PROJECT, KNNL, NO.1, MUNDARAGI-582118. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. CHETAN MUNNOLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KNNL, SINGATALURU LIFT IRRIGATION PROJECT, HUVINHADAGALI-583219, DIST. BALLARI. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GADAG, MINI VIDAH SOUDHA (DC OFFICE), HUBBALLI ROAD, GADAG-582103. 3. MUDAKANAGOUDA S/O. VENKANAGOUDA BHANDI, AGE 68 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. SAMBHAPUR-581111, TAL: DIST. GADAG. …RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 64(1) OF RFCTLARR ACT 2013, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN LAC NO.42/2019 DATED 23.09.2023 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, GADAG AND THE LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT AUTHORITY 2013 AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, GADAG AND THE LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT AUTHORITY 2013 PASSED IN LAC NO.42/2019 DATED 23.09.2023 AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4551 MFA No. 104602 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that two appeals have been filed challenging the judgment and award passed by the trial Court. Therefore, the appellant do not press this appeal and memo is filed to this effect. Memo is placed on record. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (UMESH M ADIGA) JUDGE AG /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23