[2025:RJ-JP:50925-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1616/2025 Chhotelal @ Chotiya S/o Shri Leelaram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Navalpura, Police Station Basdayal, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) (At Present serving his sentence in Central Jail, Alwar) Through His Brother Pritam S/o Shri Leelaram, Aged About 36 Years R/o Navalpura, Tan Ratanpura, Police Station Basdayal, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) 301024. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The District Parole Advisory Committee, Through Its Chairman, District Magistrate, Kotputli-Behror. 3. Superintendent Central Jail, Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishram Prajapati, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 17/12/2025 Accused petitioner has filed this Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) seeking second regular parole for a period of 30 days. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide judgment dated 6.10.2020 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Alwar in Sessions case no. 132/2019, the petitioner was convicted for the offence under Sections 341, 323/149, 342, 354, 376(D), 506, 509, 386, 395, 365, 327 IPC; Section 3(1)(e), 3(1)(u), 3(1)(w)(i), 3(2)(v) of [2025:RJ-JP:50925-DB] (2 of 5) [CRLW-1616/2025] SC/ST Act; Section 67, 67A of the Information and Technology Act and Section 4/6 of Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for remainder period of natural life. The petitioner filed D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 252/2020 before this Court, which is pending consideration. It is also submitted by counsel for the petitioner that parole application of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that the Superintendent of Police, District Kotputli-Behror has given an adverse report against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has remained in custody for a period of more than 7 years. It is further submitted that earlier the petitioner filed D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 1372/2025 and in view of the statement made by Superintendent of Police, Kotputli-Behror, the order dated 8.10.2025 qua the petitioner was set-aside and District Parole Advisory Committee was directed to pass a fresh and reasoned speaking order within two weeks from the date of receipt of record of the District Superintendent of Police. It is also contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has availed 1st regular parole for 20 days and he himself surrendered in time after expiry of said parole period and has not misused the liberty of parole granted to him by this Court. As per the report of the Superintendent, Central Jail, Alwar, his jail conduct was satisfactory. Thus, there is no justification in rejecting the petitioner’s second parole application. Learned GA-cum-Additional Advocate General has vehemently opposed the present criminal writ petition (Parole) and it is submitted that the Superintendent of Police has reported [2025:RJ-JP:50925-DB] (3 of 5) [CRLW-1616/2025] that if the petitioner is released on parole, an untoward incident may take place. In counter to the above, counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the report of the social welfare officer is in favour of the petitioner and the jail conduct of the petitioner, as reported by the Superintendent, Central Jail, Alwar is also satisfactory. We have considered the contentions advanced by counsel for the parties and perused the material on record. Rule 9 of the Rajasthan Prisoners (Release on Parole) Rules, 1958 reads as under: “9. Parole period - A prisoner, who has completed with remission, if any, [one-fourth] of his sentence and subject to good conduct in the Jail, may be released on Ist parole for 20 days including days of journey to home and back, and for 30 days on 2nd parole provided his behaviour has been good during the Ist parole and for 40 days on third parole provided his behaviour has been good during the second parole. If during the third parole also the prisoner has behaved well and his character has been exceedingly well and if the prisoner's conduct has been such that he is not likely to relapse into crime, his case may be recommended to the Government through the [State Committee] for permanent release on parole on such conditions as deemed fit by the Superintendent Jail and the District Magistrate concerned; the chief condition among them being that if the prisoner while on parole commits any offence or abets, directly or indirectly, commission [2025:RJ-JP:50925-DB] (4 of 5) [CRLW-1616/2025] of any offence, he has to undergo the unexpired portion of the sentence in addition to any sentence imposed upon him by reason of such an offence. In cases the permanent release on parole is rejected the prisoner will be eligible for release on parole for 40 days every year subject to the same conditions for the remaining period of his sentence. [Provided the cases of prisoners who have been sentenced to imprisonment for life, for an offence for which death penalty is one of the punishments provided by law or who have been sentenced to death but this sentence has been commuted under section 433 of Code of Criminal Procedure into one of life imprisonment shall not be placed before the State Committee for permanent release on parole unless he has served 14 years of imprisonment excluding remission but including the period of detention passed during enquiry, investigation or trial. Such prisoners may be released on parole for 40 days every year for the remaining period of their sentence subject to the conditions stated above.]”. Considering the fact that the petitioner has served more than 7 years of sentence including remission period, the petitioner earlier availed 1st regular parole of 20 days and he himself surrendered before the jail authorities and there is nothing on record which could substantiate the rejection of petitioner’s second parole application, we deem it proper to allow the present writ petition, set-aside the order dated 28.11.2025 qua the petitioner and release him on second regular parole of 30 days in accordance with the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on parole Rules, 1958. [2025:RJ-JP:50925-DB] (5 of 5) [CRLW-1616/2025] For the aforesaid reasons, criminal writ petition (Parole) is allowed; the order dated 28.11.2025 qua petitioner is set-aside and the Jail authorities are directed to release the petitioner on second regular parole of 30 days, provided the petitioner furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent to the effect that he shall surrender before the concerned Jail Superintendent immediately on completion of the parole period and shall maintain peace and tranquility during the parole period. The 30 days’ parole period shall be counted from the date of the petitioner’s release. In case of his failure to surrender by stipulated date, the jail authorities shall be free to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned Jail Superintendent by fax today itself for necessary compliance. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (SUDESH BANSAL),J DK/13