RAJENDRA NARAYAN BHANASE v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE ADDL CHIEF SEC., REVENUE (STAMPS AND REGISTRATION ) DEPT. AND ORS
IA/15618/2024 · 2025-01-10
Shri A S Chandurkar, Shri M M Sathaye
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43870 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 43870 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
38, 42 & 43 IA-12367-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION (SR. NO.38) INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12367 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 590 OF 2022 Mangesh Bhalchandra Gaikwad ...Applicant/Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents AND (SR. NO.42) INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15618 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 13757 OF 2024 Rajendra Narayan Bhanase ...Applicant/Petitioner Versus State Of Maharashtra And Ors ...Respondents AND (SR. NO.43) INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15682 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 22587 OF 2024 Dilip Ananta Thorat And Ors ...Applicants/Petitioners Versus The Government Of Maharashtra And Ors ...Respondents ----- Ms. Sonali Pawar i/b. Mr. Sandeep Dere, for Applicants in all IAs. Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for Respondent/State in IA/12367/2024. Mr. Shahaji Shinde, ‘B’ Panel Counsel a/w. Mr. S.L. Babar, AGP for Respondent/State in IA/15618/2024 and IA/15682/2024. -----
CORAM: A.S. CHANDURKAR &
M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.
DATE : 10TH JANUARY 2025 P.C. :
1. By these applications it is prayed that the orders refusing registration be recalled and the writ petitions be restored to files. Husen 1/2
38, 42 & 43 IA-12367-2024.doc
2. We have perused the applications and heard the learned counsel for the parties. Considering the reasons mentioned in the applications, the orders refusing registration are recalled subject to office objections being removed within a period of four weeks from today.
3. On aforesaid terms, the writ petitions would be restored to file.
4. Interim applications are allowed in aforesaid terms.
(M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.) Husen 2/2