Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43868 (RAJ)

POONAM SINGH W/O NAVEEN MITTAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19541/2025 · 2025-12-11

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:50378] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19541/2025 1. Poonam Singh W/o Naveen Mittal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o A-45, Arihant Nagar, Jamdoli, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Jagdish Yogi S/o Suresh Chand Yogi, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Julahapada, Bhusawar, Tehsil Bhusawar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 3. Narendra Singh S/o Ramesh Narayan, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Kurka, Tehsil Ucchain, District Bharatpur , Rajasthan 4. Mamta Maurya D/o Brij Mohan Maurya, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Lal Darwaja, Bayana, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 5. Murari Lal Meena S/o Harkesh Meen, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vpo Bamanwas, Patti Khurd, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. 6. Balram Meena S/o Bhorya Ram Meena, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Suroth, Near Bus Stand, Tehsil Suroth, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 7. Umesh Kumar Sharma S/o Vasudeb Prasad Sharma, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Bhageetpura, Tehsil Baseri, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 8. Saroj W/o Nand Kishor, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Bajrang Garh Colony, Riyan Bari, District Nagaur, Rajasthan. 9. Jitendra Kumar S/o Ramprakash, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Sonothi, Tehsil Ucchain, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 10. Vijay Kumar Singh S/o Dhurandhar Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Saipau, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 11. Gautam Shakya S/o Ramswaroop Koli, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Patal Devi Mandir Ke Pass, Santras Para, Tehsil Bari, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 12. Jitendra Singh Saimara S/o Tikaram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Somali, Tehsil Suroth, District Karauli, Rajasthan. 13. Ratan Lal Kumhar S/o Deviram Kumhar, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Ishwana, Tehsil Reni, District Alwar, [2025:RJ-JP:50378] (2 of 4) [CW-19541/2025] Rajasthan. 14. Lad Kumari Khateek W/o Ratan Lal Khateek, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Raila, Tehsil Banera, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan. 15. Birma Devi W/o Yad Ram, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Dudhwa, Tehsil Khetri, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 16. Kalyan Singh S/o Ram Bharoshee, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Saipau, Tehsil Saipau, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 17. Sarita Yadav D/o Niranjan Lal Yadav, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Peepli, Tehsil Mundawar Alwar, District Khairthal Tijara, Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director, Women And Child Development Department, 2, Jal Path, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur. 2. The Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 4. The Deputy Director (Administration), Integrated Child Development Services, 2, Jal Path, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.M. Sharma and Vishal Kumar for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 11/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- [2025:RJ-JP:50378] (3 of 4) [CW-19541/2025] “i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be directed to give salary and allowances and notional benefits and other service benefits to Petitioners as given to the candidates who selected/appointed for the post of Pre Primary Teacher. ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be directed to give all service benefit/promotion/notional benefits as given in the case of Gurnam Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. SBCWP NO. 17470/2025 decided on 10.09.2025 (Annex.3). iii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be directed to give all service benefit/promotion/notional benefits as given in the case of Deepak Parashar & Ors. Vs. Staste of Rajasthan & Ors. SBCWP No.15963/2025 decided on 16.10.2025 (Annexure 4).” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present writ petition is squarely covered by the ratio laid down in judgment dated 21.11.2017 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court in case of Om Prakash and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.21214/2017 wherein relief has been granted to the petitioners in light of judgment in case of Hemlata Shrimali and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3247/2015 decided on 01.04.2015, therefore, the present writ petition may also be decided in light of judgment in case of Om Prakash and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Hemlata Shrimali and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). [2025:RJ-JP:50378] (4 of 4) [CW-19541/2025] 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of in light of judgment passed in case of Om Prakash and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Hemlata Shrimali and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), if applicable upon the facts of the case. This order is passed based on submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the present matter and only in case, the averment therein are found to be correct, the petitioner(s) would be entitled for the said relief, as laid down in judgments referred hereinabove. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /53