Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43868 (KAR)

SRI UDAY S/O GOPAL KULKARNI v. THE SAMARTH URBAN CO OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD BELGAUM

WP/102094/2025 · 2025-03-27

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5654 WP No. 102094 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 102094 OF 2025 (CS-DAS) BETWEEN: SRI. UDAY S/O GOPAL KULKARNI, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: #254, KIRANODAY BLDG, OPP. JAIN TEMPLE, HINDWADI, BELAGAVI-590 011. … PETITIONER (BY MISS. VAIBHAVI INAMDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: THE SAMARTH URBAN CO-OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., BELGAUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, HAVING ITS MAIN BRANCH AT MARUTI GALLI, BELAGAVI-590 001. … RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5654 WP No. 102094 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Mis.Vaibhavi Inamadar., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by her and the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same. 4. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. 5. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH/MRP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 33