Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 43857 (CHH)

SMT. PREMIN BAI MANJHI v. NANDLAL SATNAMI

MAC/231/2019 · 2025-06-16

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:24756 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 231 of 2019 1 - Smt. Premin Bai Manjhi W/o Late Jugeshwar Manijhi Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Laldadhipara ,ward No. 12, Post Office And Police Station Mahasamund District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh 2 - Bholaram Manjhi S/o Late Jugeshwar Manjhi Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Laldadhipara,ward No. 12,post Office And Police Station Mahasamund District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. ... Appellants Versus 1 - Nandlal Satnami S/o Sonsay Satnami Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Amawash ,post Office And Police Station Tumgaon District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.(Driver Of Vehicle Motor Cycle Hero Honda Passion Pro Bearing Registration No. Cg/06/ Cg/9396), District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ganga Prasad Kosre S/o Amaru Ram Kosre Aged About 55 Years R/o Satnami Para Village Kharora ,mahasamund District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.(Registered Owner Of Vehicle Motor Cycle Hero Honda Passion Pro Bearing Registration No. Cg/06/ Cg/9396), District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Branch Manager The Icici Genral Insurance Company Limted Through The Branch Manager Devendra Nagar Chowk Jail Road ,raipur Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.(Insurer Of Vehicle Motor Cycle Hero Honda Passion Pro Bearing Registration No. Cg/06/ Cg/9396), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Non-Appellants For Appellants : Mr. Shivendu Pandya, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order On Board SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY 2 17/06/2025 1. This appeal is filed by the appellant seeking enhancement of the amount of compensation awarded by the learned Claims Tribunal in its award dated 26.07.2018 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mahasamund, District – Mahasamund (C.G.) in Claim Case No. H-16/2016. 2. Learned counsel for appellants submit that he may be permitted to withdraw this appeal at this stage. 3. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellants, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey